Literature DB >> 3902844

A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty.

R S Bell, J Schatzker, V L Fornasier, S B Goodman.   

Abstract

Using clinical, radiographic, and pathological data, we investigated eighteen cases of early aseptic failure of an implant in patients who had undergone reconstruction of the hip with a Wagner resurfacing prosthesis. Sixteen patients required revision for loosening of the acetabular component, with eight of them also demonstrating loosening of the femoral component. One patient had loosening of the femoral component without failure of the acetabular component, and one patient sustained a femoral neck fracture that was associated with osteonecrosis. Six of the patients with loosening of the acetabular component had an associated significant loss of acetabular bone stock. Loosening was associated with the development of a membrane at the bone-cement interface in all patients. Histological examination of the membrane demonstrated a marked foreign-body response to wear products from the arthroplasty. Bone resorption appeared active at the bone-membrane interface. We concluded that the acetabular component of the Wagner prosthesis is prone to early loosening and that the early loosening is potentiated by a foreign-body response to debris resulting from arthroplastic wear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3902844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

1.  [Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results].

Authors:  T Hess; T Gampe; C Köttgen; B Szawlowski
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Hip resurfacing arthroplasty].

Authors:  W-C Witzleb; A Knecht; T Beichler; T Köhler; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Authors:  Claire L Brockett; Phil Harper; Sophie Williams; Graham H Isaac; Rob S Dwyer-Joyce; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Hip implant evaluation in an arthritic animal model.

Authors:  T W Phillips; K R Gurr; D R Rao
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Quantitative comparison of the histological effects of particulate polymethylmethacrylate versus polyethylene in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  S B Goodman; V L Fornasier; J Kei
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  [Surgical principles and clinical experiences with the DUROM hip resurfacing system using a lateral approach].

Authors:  Sascha Gravius; Torsten Mumme; Oliver Weber; Philipp Berdel; Dieter Christian Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Christine M Pui; Matthew J Ludeman; Thomas P Vail; Marc D Silverstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty of the canine hip.

Authors:  J Schatzker; S B Goodman; G Sumner-Smith; V L Fornasier; N Goften; R S Bell
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

10.  Granulomatous pseudotumors in total joint replacement.

Authors:  H J Griffiths; J Burke; T A Bonfiglio
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.