Literature DB >> 30206695

Comparison of measured and calculated doses in a Rando phantom with a realistic lung radiotherapy treatment plan including heterogeneities.

Serine Sarra Bouacid1,2, Fayçal Kharfi3,4, Fouad Boulakhssaim5.   

Abstract

In this work, dose measurements were performed to evaluate an external radiotherapy treatment plan and, particularly, to validate dose calculations for a lung lesion case. Doses were calculated by the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system using the AAA anisotropic analytical algorithm. The measurements were performed using a Rando anthropomorphic phantom and TLD700 thermoluminescent dosimeters. The comparison between doses calculated and doses measured by means of thermoluminescence (TL) shows compatibility except for a few points, due to the limitations in the heterogeneity correction used for the case studied here. The deviation between the calculated and measured doses is about 6.5% for low (< 0.5 Gy) doses and about 1% for higher doses (> 0.5 Gy).The deviation between AAA-calculated and TL-measured doses was also found to be higher in proximity to heterogeneous tissue interfaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose calculation; Heterogeneity correction; Radiotherapy; Rando anthropomorphic phantom; Thermoluminescent dosimeter

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30206695     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0755-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Physical and methodological aspects of multimodality imaging and principles of treatment planning in 3D conformal radiotherapy].

Authors:  D Lefkopoulos; J N Foulquier; Y Petegnief; E Touboul
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.018

2.  Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in phantoms with lung equivalent heterogeneities under conditions of lateral electronic disequilibrium.

Authors:  P Carrasco; N Jornet; M A Duch; L Weber; M Ginjaume; T Eudaldo; D Jurado; A Ruiz; M Ribas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric verification of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Christopher M Bragg; John Conway
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.

Authors:  Ann Van Esch; Laura Tillikainen; Jukka Pyykkonen; Mikko Tenhunen; Hannu Helminen; Sami Siljamäki; Jyrki Alakuijala; Marta Paiusco; Mauro Lori; Dominique P Huyskens
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Validation of Varian's AAA algorithm with focus on lung treatments.

Authors:  Heidi S Rønde; Lone Hoffmann
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 6.  In vivo dosimetry for lung radiotherapy including SBRT.

Authors:  Boyd M C McCurdy; Peter M McCowan
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 7.  [Delineation of organs at risk and dose constraints].

Authors:  G Noël; D Antoni; I Barillot; B Chauvet
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.018

8.  Algorithms used in heterogeneous dose calculations show systematic differences as measured with the Radiological Physics Center's anthropomorphic thorax phantom used for RTOG credentialing.

Authors:  Stephen F Kry; Paola Alvarez; Andrea Molineu; Carrie Amador; James Galvin; David S Followill
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Dose prediction accuracy of anisotropic analytical algorithm and pencil beam convolution algorithm beyond high density heterogeneity interface.

Authors:  Suresh B Rana
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2013-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.