Literature DB >> 15543062

Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle.

Takeshi Sakamoto1, Masashi Neo, Takashi Nakamura.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: We evaluated the trajectory of transpedicular screws in the cervical spine using axial computed tomography (CT).
OBJECTIVES: To provide a safe transpedicular screw trajectory by measuring the dimensions of the cervical pedicle and evaluating the entrance points and the insertion angles of transpedicular screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The morphology of the cervical pedicle has been studied, but few in vivo CT-based studies of pedicle dimensions and transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine have been reported.
METHODS: The dimensions of the pedicles (C3-C7) were determined in 30 patients with cervical spinal lesions from CT images. The space available for transpedicular screws (SAS) was defined as the distance between two parallel lines tangential to the spinal canal and the transverse foramen, respectively. SAS was evaluated at 25 degrees and 50 degrees insertion angles.
RESULTS: SAS at a 25 degrees insertion angle (SAS-25) ranged from 4.7 to 5.4 mm. SAS at 50 degrees (SAS-50) ranged from 6.1 to 6.6 mm. SAS-25 and SAS-50 were significantly different. Four-millimeter-diameter screws would fit in all 120 C3-C6 vertebrae studied at 50 degrees, but 20 (17%) would not fit at 25 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: Axial CT measurements should facilitate transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine. We believe that the screw insertion angle should be close to 50 degrees, which is the mean pedicle transverse angle from C3-C6. The entry point of the pedicle screw should be located as laterally as possible in the posterior surface of the lateral mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543062     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144404.68486.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

Review 1.  Ethnic differences in pedicle and bony spinal canal dimensions calculated from computed tomography of the cervical spine: a review of the English-language literature.

Authors:  Masaaki Chazono; Takaaki Tanaka; Yoshio Kumagae; Tomoaki Sai; Keishi Marumo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Rene Schmidt; Michael Mayer; Wolfgang Hitzl; Juliane Zenner; Stefan Midderhoff; Stefan Middendorf; Nicolaus Graf; Nicolaus Gräf; H Resch; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hans-Joachim Willke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  3D-based navigation in posterior stabilisations of the cervical and thoracic spine: problems and benefits. Results of 451 screws.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Katscher; A Franck; S Glasmacher; C Schmidt; T Blattert; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data.

Authors:  M Reinhold; F Magerl; M Rieger; M Blauth
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  CT evaluation of cervical pedicle in a Chinese population for surgical application of transpedicular screw placement.

Authors:  Zhu Ruofu; Yang Huilin; Hu Xiaoyun; He Xishun; Tang Tiansi; Chen Liang; Li Xigong
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Comparison of two novel fluoroscopy-based stereotactic methods for cervical pedicle screw placement and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Bach; L Audigé; R Bale; R Attal; M Blauth; F Magerl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Frank Acosta; Michael Fox; Armin Scheiter; Mark Tauber; Ulrich Holz; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope.

Authors:  Yasutsugu Yukawa; Fumihiko Kato; Keigo Ito; Yumiko Horie; Tetsurou Hida; Hiroaki Nakashima; Masaaki Machino
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.

Authors:  Masahiro Nishinome; Haku Iizuka; Yoichi Iizuka; Kenji Takagishi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Preoperative imaging of cervical pedicles: comparison of accuracy of oblique radiographs versus axial CT scans.

Authors:  James P Sieradzki; Eldin E Karaikovic; Eugene P Lautenschlager; Martin L Lazarus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.