Literature DB >> 15530546

A biological-based model that links genomic instability, bystander effects, and adaptive response.

B R Scott1.   

Abstract

This paper links genomic instability, bystander effects, and adaptive response in mammalian cell communities via a novel biological-based, dose-response model called NEOTRANS3. The model is an extension of the NEOTRANS2 model that addressed stochastic effects (genomic instability, mutations, and neoplastic transformation) associated with brief exposure to low radiation doses. With both models, ionizing radiation produces DNA damage in cells that can be associated with varying degrees of genomic instability. Cells with persistent problematic instability (PPI) are mutants that arise via misrepair of DNA damage. Progeny of PPI cells also have PPI and can undergo spontaneous neoplastic transformation. Unlike NEOTRANS2, with NEOTRANS3 newly induced mutant PPI cells and their neoplastically transformed progeny can be suppressed via our previously introduced protective apoptosis-mediated (PAM) process, which can be activated by low linear energy transfer (LET) radiation. However, with NEOTRANS3 (which like NEOTRANS2 involves cross-talk between nongenomically compromised [e.g., nontransformed, nonmutants] and genomically compromised [e.g., mutants, transformants, etc.] cells), it is assumed that PAM is only activated over a relatively narrow, dose-rate-dependent interval (D(PAM),D(off)); where D(PAM) is a small stochastic activation threshold, and D(off) is the stochastic dose above which PAM does not occur. PAM cooperates with activated normal DNA repair and with activated normal apoptosis in guarding against genomic instability. Normal repair involves both error-free repair and misrepair components. Normal apoptosis and the error-free component of normal repair protect mammals by preventing the occurrence of mutant cells. PAM selectively removes mutant cells arising via the misrepair component of normal repair, selectively removes existing neoplastically transformed cells, and probably selectively removes other genomically compromised cells when it is activated. PAM likely involves multiple pathways to apoptosis, with the selected pathway depending on the type of cell to be removed, its cellular environment, and on the nature of the genomic damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15530546     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  19 in total

1.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Spatial cycles in G-protein crowd control.

Authors:  Nachiket Vartak; Philippe Bastiaens
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Olga V Komova; Elena A Nasonova; Larisa A Mel'nikova; Nina L Shmakova; Michaël Beuve
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Systems biology and its potential role in radiobiology.

Authors:  Ludwig Feinendegen; Philip Hahnfeldt; Eric E Schadt; Michael Stumpf; Eberhard O Voit
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Identification of proteins secreted into the medium by human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with or without adaptive environments.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Xianyin Lai; Louise Honikel; Paiboon Reungpatthanaphong; Frank A Witzmann
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.