Literature DB >> 26708100

Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation: Part 2--application to radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in human carcinoma cells.

Micaela Cunha1,2,3, Etienne Testa1,2,3, Olga V Komova4, Elena A Nasonova4, Larisa A Mel'nikova4, Nina L Shmakova4, Michaël Beuve5,6,7.   

Abstract

The biological phenomena observed at low doses of ionizing radiation (adaptive response, bystander effects, genomic instability, etc.) are still not well understood. While at high irradiation doses, cellular death may be directly linked to DNA damage, at low doses, other cellular structures may be involved in what are known as non-(DNA)-targeted effects. Mitochondria, in particular, may play a crucial role through their participation in a signaling network involving oxygen/nitrogen radical species. According to the size of the implicated organelles, the fluctuations in the energy deposited into these target structures may impact considerably the response of cells to low doses of ionizing irradiation. Based on a recent simulation of these fluctuations, a theoretical framework was established to have further insight into cell responses to low doses of photon irradiation, namely the triggering of radioresistance mechanisms by energy deposition into specific targets. Three versions of a model are considered depending on the target size and on the number of targets that need to be activated by energy deposition to trigger radioresistance mechanisms. These model versions are applied to the fraction of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations measured at low doses in human carcinoma cells (CAL51). For this cell line, it was found in the present study that the mechanisms of radioresistance could not be triggered by the activation of a single small target (nanometric size, 100 nm), but could instead be triggered by the activation of a large target (micrometric, 10 μm) or by the activation of a great number of small targets. The mitochondria network, viewed either as a large target or as a set of small units, might be concerned by these low-dose effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAL51; Chromosomal aberrations; Low dose; Microdosimetry; Modeling; Nanodosimetry; Non-targeted effects; Radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26708100     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-015-0622-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  47 in total

1.  Activation of constitutive nitric-oxide synthase activity is an early signaling event induced by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  J Kevin Leach; Stephen M Black; Rupert K Schmidt-Ullrich; Ross B Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low dose and low-dose-rate exposures, using the microdose approach.

Authors:  L E Feinendegen
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Biological detection of low radiation doses by combining results of two microarray analysis methods.

Authors:  G Mercier; N Berthault; J Mary; J Peyre; A Antoniadis; J-P Comet; A Cornuejols; C Froidevaux; M Dutreix
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Track structure calculations on intracellular targets responsible for signal release in bystander experiments with transfer of irradiated cell-conditioned medium.

Authors:  Pavel Kundrát; Werner Friedland
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Sensitivity to low-dose/low-LET ionizing radiation in mammalian cells harboring mutations in succinate dehydrogenase subunit C is governed by mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Nukhet Aykin-Burns; Benjamin G Slane; Annie T Y Liu; Kjerstin M Owens; Malinda S O'Malley; Brian J Smith; Frederick E Domann; Douglas R Spitz
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Radiation-induced genomic instability and persisting oxidative stress in primary bone marrow cultures.

Authors:  S M Clutton; K M Townsend; C Walker; J D Ansell; E G Wright
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Mitochondrial superoxide flashes: metabolic biomarkers of skeletal muscle activity and disease.

Authors:  Lan Wei; Gheorghe Salahura; Simona Boncompagni; Karl A Kasischke; Feliciano Protasi; Shey-Shing Sheu; Robert T Dirksen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Refinement of the dichlorofluorescein assay for flow cytometric measurement of reactive oxygen species in irradiated and bystander cell populations.

Authors:  Kurt Hafer; Keisuke S Iwamoto; Robert H Schiestl
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Permeability transition pore-mediated mitochondrial superoxide flashes regulate cortical neural progenitor differentiation.

Authors:  Yan Hou; Mark P Mattson; Aiwu Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced ROS release: a new phenomenon accompanying induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition in cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  D B Zorov; C R Filburn; L O Klotz; J L Zweier; S J Sollott
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2000-10-02       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modeling cell response to low doses of photon irradiation--Part 1: on the origin of fluctuations.

Authors:  Micaela Cunha; Etienne Testa; Olga V Komova; Elena A Nasonova; Larisa A Mel'nikova; Nina L Shmakova; Michaël Beuve
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.925

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.