BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No widespread clinical method provides specific information about the angiogenic characteristics of gliomas. We characterized blood volume and vascular morphologic parameters from combined gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) MR imaging and assessed their relationship to tumor grade, a known correlate of glioma angiogenesis. METHODS: Simultaneous GE and SE echo-planar imaging was performed with bolus gadolinium administration (0.20-0.25 mmol/kg) in 73 patients with glioma. To diminish possible T1 changes due to contrast agent extravasation, a preload (0.05-0.10 mmol/kg) was administered before the study, and a postprocessing correction algorithm was applied. Image maps of total (GE) and microvascular (SE) relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and the mean vessel diameter (mVD) calculated from the ratio of GE and SE relaxation rate changes (DeltaR2*/DeltaR2) were compared with tumor grade. A nonparametric K nearest-neighbor decision rule was applied to determine if the combined data could be used to distinguish low-grade (I-II) from high-grade (III-IV) tumors on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: For whole tumors, significant correlations were found between GE rCBV and grade (P < .0001) and between mVD and grade (P = .0001) but not between SE rCBV and grade (P = .08). For areas of highest SE rCBV (microvascular hotspots), SE rCBV and tumor grade were significantly correlated (P = .0007). In terms of differentiation, 69% of low-grade tumors and 96% of high-grade tumors were correctly classified. CONCLUSION: Combined GE and SE MR imaging provides information consistent with neoplastic angiogenesis, demonstrating its potential to aid in optimizing treatments, categorizing lesions, and influencing patient care. Copyright American Society of Neuroradiology
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No widespread clinical method provides specific information about the angiogenic characteristics of gliomas. We characterized blood volume and vascular morphologic parameters from combined gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) MR imaging and assessed their relationship to tumor grade, a known correlate of glioma angiogenesis. METHODS: Simultaneous GE and SE echo-planar imaging was performed with bolus gadolinium administration (0.20-0.25 mmol/kg) in 73 patients with glioma. To diminish possible T1 changes due to contrast agent extravasation, a preload (0.05-0.10 mmol/kg) was administered before the study, and a postprocessing correction algorithm was applied. Image maps of total (GE) and microvascular (SE) relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and the mean vessel diameter (mVD) calculated from the ratio of GE and SE relaxation rate changes (DeltaR2*/DeltaR2) were compared with tumor grade. A nonparametric K nearest-neighbor decision rule was applied to determine if the combined data could be used to distinguish low-grade (I-II) from high-grade (III-IV) tumors on a per-patient basis. RESULTS: For whole tumors, significant correlations were found between GE rCBV and grade (P < .0001) and between mVD and grade (P = .0001) but not between SE rCBV and grade (P = .08). For areas of highest SE rCBV (microvascular hotspots), SE rCBV and tumor grade were significantly correlated (P = .0007). In terms of differentiation, 69% of low-grade tumors and 96% of high-grade tumors were correctly classified. CONCLUSION: Combined GE and SE MR imaging provides information consistent with neoplastic angiogenesis, demonstrating its potential to aid in optimizing treatments, categorizing lesions, and influencing patient care. Copyright American Society of Neuroradiology
Authors: H J Bernsen; P F Rijken; J P Peters; J H Bakker; R H Boerman; P Wesseling; A J van der Kogel Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: M Fuss; F Wenz; M Essig; M Muenter; J Debus; T S Herman; M Wannenmacher Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tracy T Batchelor; A Gregory Sorensen; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Wei-Ting Zhang; Dan G Duda; Kenneth S Cohen; Kevin R Kozak; Daniel P Cahill; Poe-Jou Chen; Mingwang Zhu; Marek Ancukiewicz; Maciej M Mrugala; Scott Plotkin; Jan Drappatz; David N Louis; Percy Ivy; David T Scadden; Thomas Benner; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Alexander D Cohen; Peter S LaViolette; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Scott D Rand; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Peter S LaViolette; Alex D Cohen; Melissa A Prah; Scott D Rand; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-02-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Asim K Bag; Phillip C Cezayirli; Jake J Davenport; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; Alan Cantor; Xiaosi S Han; Louis B Nabors Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kathleen M Schmainda; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Scott D Rand; Raymond G Hoffman; Wade Mueller; Mark G Malkin Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina Tsien; Pia C Sundgren; Charles R Meyer; Larry Junck; Jennifer Boes; Stefanie Galbán; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Craig J Galbán Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-01 Impact factor: 4.243