Literature DB >> 8372199

Tumor vascularity in the brain: evaluation with dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR imaging.

M Maeda1, S Itoh, H Kimura, T Iwasaki, N Hayashi, K Yamamoto, Y Ishii, T Kubota.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of dynamic susceptibility-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosis of intraaxial brain tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with such tumors (two hemangioblastomas, five low-grade astrocytomas, and three glioblastomas) underwent examination at 1.5 T. After bolus injection of 0.15 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine, gradient-echo MR images were obtained every 3.6 seconds for 90 seconds. Region-of-interest analyses were performed in all tumors.
RESULTS: The greatest loss in signal intensity during the first pass of the contrast agent was seen in hemangioblastomas; low-grade astrocytomas had the least loss. The differences in integration of change in the T2* relaxation rate were significant among the three types of tumor (hemangioblastomas vs low-grade astrocytomas, P < .001; hemangioblastomas vs glioblastomas, P < .005; and glioblastomas vs low-grade astrocytomas, P < .02) and indicated differences in vascularity.
CONCLUSION: Dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR imaging can provide useful hemodynamic information about intraaxial brain tumors that is not provided by standard MR imaging and therefore contributes to the differential diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8372199     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  45 in total

1.  MR imaging of brain tumors: toward physiologic imaging.

Authors:  H C Roberts; W P Dillon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Blood volume of gliomas determined by double-echo dynamic perfusion-weighted MR imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors:  H Uematsu; M Maeda; N Sadato; T Matsuda; Y Ishimori; Y Koshimoto; H Kimura; H Yamada; Y Kawamura; Y Yonekura; H Itoh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  A Shenoy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Predicting and optimizing the territory of blood-brain barrier opening by superselective intra-arterial cerebral infusion under dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI guidance.

Authors:  Miroslaw Janowski; Piotr Walczak; Monica S Pearl
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Advances in the assessment of childhood brain tumors and treatment-related sequelae.

Authors:  Katherine E Warren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.081

6.  A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method.

Authors:  Arvind P Pathak; B Douglas Ward; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors.

Authors:  Eric S Paulson; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Vascular change measured with independent component analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI predicts bevacizumab response in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Peter S LaViolette; Alex D Cohen; Melissa A Prah; Scott D Rand; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Dynamic-susceptibility contrast agent MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume predict response to bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmainda; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Scott D Rand; Raymond G Hoffman; Wade Mueller; Mark G Malkin
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Molecular Imaging of Cancer: Applications of Magnetic Resonance Methods.

Authors:  Barjor Gimi; Arvind P Pathak; Ellen Ackerstaff; Kristine Glunde; Dmitri Artemov; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 10.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.