Literature DB >> 11590650

MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis.

A P Pathak1, K M Schmainda, B D Ward, J R Linderman, K J Rebro, A S Greene.   

Abstract

In an effort to develop MRI methods for the evaluation of tumor angiogenesis (new blood vessel formation), MRI-derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) information has been compared to histologic measures of microvessel density (MVD). Although MVD is a standard marker of angiogenesis, it is not a direct correlate of the volume measurements made with MRI, and therefore inappropriate for the development and validation of the MR techniques. Therefore, the goal of this study was to develop an approach by which MR measurements of CBV can be directly correlated. To this end, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI experiments were performed in six Fisher rats implanted with 9L gliosarcoma brain tumors. Subsequently, the circulation was perfused with a latex compound (Microfil), after which 50-microm tissue sections were analyzed for vessel count, diameter, and the fraction of area comprised of vessels. The results demonstrate that while fractional area (FA) does not provide a good measure of CBV, FA corrected for section thickness effects does. Whereas the FA in normal brain was found to be 13.03 +/- 1.83% the corrected FA, or fractional volume (FV), was 1.89 +/- 0.39%, a value in agreement with those reported in the literature for normal brain. Furthermore, while no significant difference was found between normal brain and tumor FA (P = 0.55), the difference was significant for FV (P = 0.036), as would be expected. And only with FV does a correlation with the MRI-derived CBV become apparent (r(S) = 0.74). There was strong correlation (r(s) = 0.886) between the tumor / normal blood volume ratios as estimated by each technique, although the MR-ratio (1.56 +/- 0.29) underestimated the histologic-ratio (2.35 +/- 0.75). Thus, the correlation of MRI CBV methods requires a measurement of fractional vessel area and correction of this area for section thickness effects. This new independent correlative measure should enable efficient and accurate progress in the development of MRI methods to evaluate tumor angiogenesis. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11590650     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  53 in total

1.  How stereological analysis of vascular morphology can quantify the blood volume fraction as a marker for tumor vasculature: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriana T Perles-Barbacaru; Boudewijn P J van der Sanden; Regine Farion; Hana Lahrech
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.200

2.  Magnetic resonance monitoring of focused ultrasound/magnetic nanoparticle targeting delivery of therapeutic agents to the brain.

Authors:  Hao-Li Liu; Mu-Yi Hua; Hung-Wei Yang; Chiung-Yin Huang; Po-Chun Chu; Jia-Shin Wu; I-Chou Tseng; Jiun-Jie Wang; Tzu-Chen Yen; Pin-Yuan Chen; Kuo-Chen Wei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  MRI of blood-brain barrier permeability in cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Quan Jiang; James R Ewing; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  Improved correlation of histological data with DCE MRI parameter maps by 3D reconstruction, reslicing and parameterization of the histological images.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Martin Le-Huu; Tobias Kunert; Matthias Thorn; Silvia Vosseler; Kerstin Schmidt; Johannes Hoffend; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Norbert E Fusenig; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; A Gregory Sorensen; Emmanuelle di Tomaso; Wei-Ting Zhang; Dan G Duda; Kenneth S Cohen; Kevin R Kozak; Daniel P Cahill; Poe-Jou Chen; Mingwang Zhu; Marek Ancukiewicz; Maciej M Mrugala; Scott Plotkin; Jan Drappatz; David N Louis; Percy Ivy; David T Scadden; Thomas Benner; Jay S Loeffler; Patrick Y Wen; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method.

Authors:  Arvind P Pathak; B Douglas Ward; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Quantification of cerebral perfusion using the "bookend technique": an evaluation in CNS tumors.

Authors:  Timothy J Carroll; Sandra Horowitz; Wanyong Shin; Jessy Mouannes; Rahul Sawlani; Saad Ali; Jeffrey Raizer; Stephen Futterer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Optimum slicing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation between histopathology and medical images.

Authors:  Li Hong Chen; Henry Ho; Richie Lazaro; Choon Hua Thng; John Yuen; Wan Sing Ng; Chris Cheng
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  In vivo quantification of transvascular water exchange during the acute phase of permanent stroke.

Authors:  Y R Kim; E Tejima; S Huang; D N Atochin; G Dai; E H Lo; P L Huang; A Bogdanov; B R Rosen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measures of relative cerebral blood volume as a prognostic marker for overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma: results from the ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625 multicenter trial.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmainda; Zheng Zhang; Melissa Prah; Bradley S Snyder; Mark R Gilbert; A Gregory Sorensen; Daniel P Barboriak; Jerrold L Boxerman
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.