BACKGROUND: Standard pre- and postcontrast (T1 + C) anatomical MR imaging is proving to be insufficient for accurately monitoring bevacizumab treatment response in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). We present a novel imaging biomarker that detects abnormal tumor vasculature exhibiting both arterial and venous perfusion characteristics. We hypothesized that a decrease in the extent of this abnormal vasculature after bevacizumab treatment would predict treatment efficacy and overall survival. METHODS: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI was gathered in 43 patients with high-grade glioma. Independent component analysis separated vasculature into arterial and venous components. Voxels with perfusion characteristics of both arteries and veins (ie, arterio-venous overlap [AVOL]) were measured in patients with de novo untreated GBM and patients with recurrent high-grade glioma before and after bevacizumab treatment. Treated patients were separated on the basis of an increase or decrease in AVOL volume (+/-ΔAVOL), and overall survival following bevacizumab onset was then compared between +/-ΔAVOL groups. RESULTS: AVOL in untreated GBM was significantly higher than in normal vasculature (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed a greater median survival (348 days) in patients with GBM with a negative ΔAVOL after bevacizumab treatment than in patients with a positive change (197 days; hazard ratio, 2.51; P < .05). Analysis of patients with combined grade III and IV glioma showed similar results, with median survivals of 399 days and 153 days, respectively (hazard ratio, 2.71; P < .01). Changes in T1+C volume and ΔrCBV after treatment were not significantly different across +/-ΔAVOL groups, and ΔAVOL was not significantly correlated with ΔT1+C or ΔrCBV. CONCLUSIONS: The independent component analysis dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived biomarker AVOL adds additional information for determining bevacizumab treatment efficacy.
BACKGROUND: Standard pre- and postcontrast (T1 + C) anatomical MR imaging is proving to be insufficient for accurately monitoring bevacizumab treatment response in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). We present a novel imaging biomarker that detects abnormal tumor vasculature exhibiting both arterial and venous perfusion characteristics. We hypothesized that a decrease in the extent of this abnormal vasculature after bevacizumab treatment would predict treatment efficacy and overall survival. METHODS: Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI was gathered in 43 patients with high-grade glioma. Independent component analysis separated vasculature into arterial and venous components. Voxels with perfusion characteristics of both arteries and veins (ie, arterio-venous overlap [AVOL]) were measured in patients with de novo untreated GBM and patients with recurrent high-grade glioma before and after bevacizumab treatment. Treated patients were separated on the basis of an increase or decrease in AVOL volume (+/-ΔAVOL), and overall survival following bevacizumab onset was then compared between +/-ΔAVOL groups. RESULTS: AVOL in untreated GBM was significantly higher than in normal vasculature (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed a greater median survival (348 days) in patients with GBM with a negative ΔAVOL after bevacizumab treatment than in patients with a positive change (197 days; hazard ratio, 2.51; P < .05). Analysis of patients with combined grade III and IV glioma showed similar results, with median survivals of 399 days and 153 days, respectively (hazard ratio, 2.71; P < .01). Changes in T1+C volume and ΔrCBV after treatment were not significantly different across +/-ΔAVOL groups, and ΔAVOL was not significantly correlated with ΔT1+C or ΔrCBV. CONCLUSIONS: The independent component analysis dynamic susceptibility contrast-derived biomarker AVOL adds additional information for determining bevacizumab treatment efficacy.
Authors: W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: K M Donahue; H G Krouwer; S D Rand; A P Pathak; C S Marszalkowski; S C Censky; R W Prost Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David N Louis; Hiroko Ohgaki; Otmar D Wiestler; Webster K Cavenee; Peter C Burger; Anne Jouvet; Bernd W Scheithauer; Paul Kleihues Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Jingwen Yao; Caleb Hock Pang Tan; Jacob Schlossman; Ararat Chakhoyan; Catalina Raymond; Whitney B Pope; Noriko Salamon; Albert Lai; Matthew Ji; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: H S Nguyen; N Milbach; S L Hurrell; E Cochran; J Connelly; J A Bovi; C J Schultz; W M Mueller; S D Rand; K M Schmainda; P S LaViolette Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Iwan E Bennett; Kathryn M Field; Christopher M Hovens; Bradford A Moffat; Mark A Rosenthal; Katharine Drummond; Andrew H Kaye; Andrew P Morokoff Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-11-28 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: L S Hu; Z Kelm; P Korfiatis; A C Dueck; C Elrod; B M Ellingson; T J Kaufmann; J M Eschbacher; J P Karis; K Smith; P Nakaji; D Brinkman; D Pafundi; L C Baxter; B J Erickson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: A N Laiwalla; F Kurth; K Leu; R Liou; J Pamplona; Y C Ooi; N Salamon; B M Ellingson; N R Gonzalez Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Bob Hamans; Anna Catharina Navis; Alan Wright; Pieter Wesseling; Arend Heerschap; William Leenders Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Peter S LaViolette; Alex D Cohen; Melissa A Prah; Scott D Rand; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-02-03 Impact factor: 12.300