Literature DB >> 17238370

An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes.

David Joos1, Qingxia Chen, James Jirjis, Kevin B Johnson.   

Abstract

User satisfaction with an electronic medical record (EMR) plays a decisive role in its implementation and subsequent use. We developed a survey tool to identify features of an EMR that contribute to user satisfaction and administered it in an adult primary care clinic. Most physician respondents were highly satisfied with the EMR and used all of its components. The EMR decreased the time to develop a synopsis of the patient and improved communication efficiency. Most respondents valued remote access to the EMR. Electronic messaging was an important component of improved care delivery according to 80% of the respondents. Access to online references within the EMR was not valued over web-based access for most respondents. Our results demonstrate acceptance of an EMR in adult primary care. Features such as remote access and electronic messaging were surprisingly useful and successful for primary care practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17238370      PMCID: PMC1839545     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  13 in total

1.  Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective.

Authors:  J W Aaronson; C L Murphy-Cullen; W M Chop; R D Frey
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?

Authors:  K H Dansky; L D Gamm; J J Vasey; C K Barsukiewicz
Journal:  J Healthc Manag       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?

Authors:  Glenn A Loomis; J Scott Ries; Robert M Saywell; Nitesh R Thakker
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 5.  A systematic review of computer-based patient record systems and quality of care: more randomized clinical trials or a broader approach?

Authors:  Cyrille Delpierre; Lise Cuzin; Judith Fillaux; Muriel Alvarez; Patrice Massip; Thierry Lang
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.038

6.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 7.  Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art.

Authors:  D F Sittig; W W Stead
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems.

Authors:  H J Murff; J Kannry
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.

Authors:  D F Sittig; G J Kuperman; J Fiskio
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

10.  Computer-based documentation: effect on parent and physician satisfaction during a pediatric health maintenance encounter.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Janet R Serwint; Lawrence M Fagan; Richard E Thompson; Modena H Wilson
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2005-03
View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Michel Labrecque; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Pierre Pluye; Pierre Frémont; Johanne Gagnon; Nadine Tremblay; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Variation in use of informatics tools among providers in a diabetes clinic.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Matthew Weinger; Kevin Johnson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

3.  Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.

Authors:  Mehmet Top; Omer Gider
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Effects of implementing electronic medical records on primary care billings and payments: a before-after study.

Authors:  R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Susan E Shultz; Karen Tu
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-10-17

5.  Challenges and facilitators to adoption of a point-of-care electronic health record in home care.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Kathryn H Bowles; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Jesse L Chittams; Cindy Liao
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2014

6.  The relationship between Elder Risk Assessment Index score and 30-day readmission from the nursing home.

Authors:  Paul Y Takahashi; Anupam Chandra; Stephen Cha; Aleta Borrud
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2011-02

7.  Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings.

Authors:  Erik W J Kokkonen; Scott A Davis; Hsien-Chang Lin; Tushar S Dabade; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators.

Authors:  L Grabenbauer; R Fraser; J McClay; N Woelfl; C B Thompson; J Cambell; J Windle
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 9.  A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Víctor H Castillo; Ana I Martínez-García; J R G Pulido
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Matthew B Weinger; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.