Literature DB >> 22841702

Employing the FITT framework to explore HIV case managers' perceptions of two electronic clinical data (ECD) summary systems.

Rebecca Schnall1, Ann B Smith, Manik Sikka, Peter Gordon, Eli Camhi, Timothy Kanter, Suzanne Bakken.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Case managers facilitate continuity of care for persons living with HIV (PLWH) by coordination of resources and referrals to social services and medical care. The complexity of HIV care and associated comorbidities drives the need for medical and psychosocial care coordination, which may be achieved through health information exchange (HIE) systems. However, the use of HIE has not been well studied in the context of HIV services. The purpose of this descriptive qualitative study is to explore factors influencing case managers' adoption of electronic clinical data (ECD) summaries as an HIE strategy in HIV care through application of the "fit between individuals, task and technology" (FITT) framework.
METHODS: Focus group methodology was used to gather perceptions from 48 participants who provided direct case management services for PLWH in New York City. Questions addressed current quality and efficiency challenges to HIE utilization in the context of case management of PLWH as well as barriers and enablers to use of an ECD summary. Analysis of the data was guided by the FITT framework.
RESULTS: Major themes by interaction type were: (1) task-technology fit - resources, time and workflow; (2) individual-task fit - training and technical support; and 3) individual-technology fit - ECD summary functionality, technical difficulties and the need of a computer for each end-user.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide evidence for the applicability of the FITT framework to explore case managers' perceptions of factors influencing the adoption of ECD summary systems for HIV care prior to actual implementation. Assessment of fit among individual, task, and technology and addressing the concerns identified prior to implementation is critical to successful adoption of health information technology as a strategy to improve quality and efficiency in health care.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841702      PMCID: PMC3463235          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  23 in total

1.  Exploring physician adoption of EMRs: a multi-case analysis.

Authors:  Ebrahim Randeree
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  The effect of care team composition on the quality of HIV care.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Peter V Marsden; Bruce E Landon; Ira B Wilson; Paul D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.929

3.  Attitudes toward medical device use errors and the prevention of adverse events.

Authors:  Todd R Johnson; Xiaozhou Tang; Mark J Graham; Juliana Brixey; James P Turley; Jiajie Zhang; Alla Keselman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2007-11

4.  Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework.

Authors:  Manolis Tsiknakis; Angelina Kouroubali
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Computerizing medical records in Japan.

Authors:  Hideo Yasunaga; Tomoaki Imamura; Shintaro Yamaki; Hiroyoshi Endo
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 6.  Use of pharmacy refill data as a measure of antiretroviral adherence.

Authors:  Robert Grossberg; Robert Gross
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  A survey of health information exchange organizations in the United States: implications for meaningful use.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; David W Bates; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Evaluation of a prototype health information system using the FITT framework.

Authors:  Wilfried Honekamp; Herwig Ostermann
Journal:  Inform Prim Care       Date:  2011

9.  Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carrie Anna McGinn; Sonya Grenier; Julie Duplantie; Nicola Shaw; Claude Sicotte; Luc Mathieu; Yvan Leduc; France Légaré; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Addressing the sociotechnical drivers of quality improvement: a case study of post-operative DVT prophylaxis computerised decision support.

Authors:  Blake J Lesselroth; Jianji Yang; Judy McConnachie; Thomas Brenk; Lisa Winterbottom
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of usability factors of four mobile devices for accessing healthcare information by adolescents.

Authors:  B Sheehan; Y Lee; M Rodriguez; V Tiase; R Schnall
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating mobile health (mHealth) technology.

Authors:  William Brown; Po-Yin Yen; Marlene Rojas; Rebecca Schnall
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Applying and Extending the FITT Framework to Identify the Challenges and Opportunities of Successful eHealth Services for Patient Self-Management: Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Sari Kujala; Elske Ammenwerth; Heta Kolanen; Minna Ervast
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.