Literature DB >> 21302133

Nurses' views on electronic medical records (EMR) in Turkey: an analysis according to use, quality and user satisfaction.

Mehmet Top1, Omer Gider.   

Abstract

Electronic medical records are generally used by nurses in hospitals. However, studies investigating views on and evaluations of electronic medical records by nurses are limited in Turkey and in other countries around the world. Thus, in this study, nurses' views on electronic medical record systems will be investigated in terms of use, quality and user satisfaction. Our goal was to investigate the views on electronic medical records used by nurses working at hospital clinics (inpatient care units). Moreover, in this study, we will examine whether there are relationships among the use, quality and user satisfaction of electronic medical records. This study is composed of field research conducted using questionnaires. To prepare the data-measuring instrument, the literature on electronic medical records was reviewed. In addition, during the pilot run of the questionnaire, some revisions were made to the measuring instrument to account for the views of nurse managers in the field. The questionnaire consists of 35 items: 12 items for use, 12 items for quality and 11 items for user satisfaction. A Likert scale type was used in this questionnaire. Responses for usage and quality were assigned a value of 1-5 ('never/almost never/not at all' to 'always/almost always') for each item. Responses for user satisfaction were assigned a value of 1-5 ('not at all', to 'very great') for each item. The study was planned and conducted on nurses working at inpatient care units at one public university hospital, one Turkish Ministry of Health hospital and one private hospital in Kocaeli. A sampling technique was not used because we aimed to conduct the questionnaire among all nurses. At the end of this study, the questionnaire had been conducted on 200 nurses. We found that the average score for the nurses' satisfaction with electronic medical records was 3.28, the average score for using electronic medical records was 1.96, and the average score for the quality of electronic medical records was 3.16. We also determined that there are significant relationships among the use, quality and user satisfaction of electronic medical records. This study revealed that there are significant differences among the mean quality scores for the EMR systems in the Ministry of health hospital, the university hospital and the private hospital. Interestingly, 59.0% of all participants in this study felt that EMR systems were not well integrated into their workflow. In addition, half of all respondents had not been trained in using EMR systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21302133     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9657-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  39 in total

1.  Physicians' and nurses' reactions to electronic medical records. Managerial and occupational implications.

Authors:  Asaf Darr; Michael I Harrison; Leora Shakked; Nira Shalom
Journal:  J Health Organ Manag       Date:  2003

2.  Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center.

Authors:  Hagop S Mekhjian; Rajee R Kumar; Lynn Kuehn; Thomas D Bentley; Phyllis Teater; Andrew Thomas; Beth Payne; Asif Ahmad
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Variation in implementation and use of computerized clinical reminders in an integrated healthcare system.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Juliet N Woods; Steven M Asch; Peter Glassman; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

5.  An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes.

Authors:  David Joos; Qingxia Chen; James Jirjis; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Nurses' experiences using a nursing information system: early stage of technology implementation.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Lee
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers.

Authors:  R D Cork; W M Detmer; C P Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Nursing information management and processing: a framework and definition for systems analysis, design and evaluation.

Authors:  W T Goossen
Journal:  Int J Biomed Comput       Date:  1996-01

9.  Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  H Laerum; G Ellingsen; A Faxvaag
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

10.  Evaluating physician satisfaction regarding user interactions with an electronic medical record system.

Authors:  D F Sittig; G J Kuperman; J Fiskio
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999
View more
  14 in total

1.  Use and satisfaction with electronic health record by primary care physicians in a health district in Brazil.

Authors:  Alexandre Alcantara Holanda; Henrique Luis do Carmo E Sá; Anya Pimentel Gomes Fernandes Vieira; Ana Maria Fontenelle Catrib
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Adoption and Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Records by Nurses in Three Governmental Hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Azza El Mahalli
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2015-11-01

3.  Validation of a nurses' views on electronic medical record systems (EMR) questionnaire in Turkish health system.

Authors:  Mehmet Top; Ali Yilmaz; Erdem Karabulut; Ochieng George Otieno; Melahat Saylam; Sevgi Bakır; Sümbül Top
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Assessing the relationship between technology readiness and continuance intention in an E-appointment system: relationship quality as a mediator.

Authors:  Shih-Chih Chen; Din Jong; Min-Tsai Lai
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  A Deterrence Approach to Regulate Nurses' Compliance with Electronic Medical Records Privacy Policy.

Authors:  Kuang-Ming Kuo; Paul C Talley; Ming-Chien Hung; Yen-Liang Chen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  An evaluation of the user-friendliness of Bayesian forecasting programs in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Alzana A Kumar; Marc Burgard; Sonya Stacey; Indy Sandaradura; Tony Lai; Christine Coorey; Marisol Cincunegui; Christine E Staatz; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Physicians' perception about electronic medical record system in Makkah Region, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Hani Abdulsattar Shaker; Mian Usman Farooq; Khalid Obeid Dhafar
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Empirical Study of Nova Scotia Nurses' Adoption of Healthcare Information Systems: Implications for Management and Policy-Making.

Authors:  Princely Ifinedo
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-04-01

9.  Determining the Hospital Information System (HIS) Success Rate: Development of a New Instrument and Case Study.

Authors:  Zahra Ebnehoseini; Hamed Tabesh; Kolsoum Deldar; Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi; Mahmood Tara
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-14

10.  A survey-based study of factors that motivate nurses to protect the privacy of electronic medical records.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Ma; Kuang-Ming Kuo; Judith W Alexander
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.