Literature DB >> 18769691

Registered nurses' use of electronic health records: findings from a national survey.

Catherine DesRoches1, Karen Donelan, Peter Buerhaus, Li Zhonghe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine the proportion of the registered nurse (RN) workforce that uses a minimally functional electronic health record (EHR) system; (2) to assess the relationship between EHR use and beliefs about quality of care and quality improvement activities; and (3) to determine whether EHR use is associated with less time spent on paperwork and documentation and more time spent in direct patient care.
DESIGN: Data were collected through use of a 6-page survey mailed to a nationally representative sample of RNs. The study is cross-sectional and examines associations between EHR use and measures of quality and time spent on patient care-related tasks. MEASUREMENTS: A minimally functional EHR was defined as routine use of electronic patient demographics; electronic ordering of tests, procedures, or drugs; electronic clinical and patient notes; electronic access to test results; and electronic decision support. RNs were categorized into those employed in practices or hospitals where 0 functionalities were in routine use, 1 to 4 functionalities were in routine use, or 5 functionalities were in routine use.
RESULTS: Fewer than 1 in 5 RNs work in healthcare settings that have adopted a minimally functional EHR. Use was related to measures of nursing excellence and increased efforts at quality improvement. There were no differences between RNs using an EHR and those not using one on time spent in patient care-related tasks.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to provide national data on RNs' use of EHRs. It suggests important relationships between EHR use, quality improvement, and nursing excellence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18769691      PMCID: PMC2525465     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medscape J Med        ISSN: 1934-1997


  9 in total

1.  Nurses' adoption of technology: application of Rogers' innovation-diffusion model.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Lee
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.257

2.  Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences.

Authors:  Linda E Moody; Elaine Slocumb; Bruce Berg; Donna Jackson
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.

Authors:  Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.484

Review 4.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Timothy G Ferris; Karen Donelan; Catherine DesRoches; Alexandra Shields; Sara Rosenbaum; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.

Authors:  Yong Y Han; Joseph A Carcillo; Shekhar T Venkataraman; Robert S B Clark; R Scott Watson; Trung C Nguyen; Hülya Bayir; Richard A Orr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Impact of the nurse shortage on hospital patient care: comparative perspectives.

Authors:  Peter I Buerhaus; Karen Donelan; Beth T Ulrich; Linda Norman; Catherine DesRoches; Robert Dittus
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.

Authors:  Esther S Hing; Catharine W Burt; David A Woodwell
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2007-10-26

Review 9.  Costs and benefits of health information technology.

Authors:  Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)       Date:  2006-04
  9 in total
  7 in total

1.  The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy Meeting.

Authors:  Caitlin M Cusack; George Hripcsak; Meryl Bloomrosen; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte A Weaver; Adam Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jim Walker; Lena Mamykina
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The effect of hospital electronic health record adoption on nurse-assessed quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Ann Kutney-Lee; Deena Kelly
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.737

3.  Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa; T S Raghu; Benjamin B M Shao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Predicting physician burnout using clinical activity logs: Model performance and lessons learned.

Authors:  Sunny S Lou; Hanyang Liu; Benjamin C Warner; Derek Harford; Chenyang Lu; Thomas Kannampallil
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, unaffiliated, community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  Jenna Howard; Elizabeth C Clark; Asia Friedman; Jesse C Crosson; Maria Pellerano; Benjamin F Crabtree; Ben-Tzion Karsh; Carlos R Jaen; Douglas S Bell; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Interdisciplinary care team adoption of electronic point-of-care documentation systems: an unrealized opportunity.

Authors:  Paulina S Sockolow; Kathryn H Bowles; Michelle Rogers; Marguerite C Adelsberger; Jesse L Chittams; Cindy Liao
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2013

7.  Conceptual considerations for using EHR-based activity logs to measure clinician burnout and its effects.

Authors:  Thomas Kannampallil; Joanna Abraham; Sunny S Lou; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.