OBJECTIVES: The Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation evaluated the impact of an electronic medical record system. METHODS: A prospective pre- and postimplementation design was utilized that examined the domains of quality, productivity, satisfaction, risk management, and financial performance. RESULTS: There were highly statistically significant improvements in timely completion of Annual Medical and 30-Day, 90-Day, and Annual Multidiscipline assessments. There was no statistically significant change in obtaining hepatitis C viral load for hepatitis C antibody-positive patients. The prevalence of risk management events was too low to detect statistically meaningful changes. Patient satisfaction was unchanged pre- and postimplementation, although staff satisfaction trended upward postimplementation. Productivity significantly declined for counseling staff; there was a nonsignificant productivity decline for medical services staff and a nonsignificant productivity increase for case manager staff. Revenue per capita staff increased by 0.6%, while cost per patient visit increased by 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite less robust results than expected, had we not implemented the electronic system, recent changes in documentation and reimbursement for services would have paralyzed our agency.
OBJECTIVES: The Addiction Research and Treatment Corporation evaluated the impact of an electronic medical record system. METHODS: A prospective pre- and postimplementation design was utilized that examined the domains of quality, productivity, satisfaction, risk management, and financial performance. RESULTS: There were highly statistically significant improvements in timely completion of Annual Medical and 30-Day, 90-Day, and Annual Multidiscipline assessments. There was no statistically significant change in obtaining hepatitis C viral load for hepatitis C antibody-positive patients. The prevalence of risk management events was too low to detect statistically meaningful changes. Patient satisfaction was unchanged pre- and postimplementation, although staff satisfaction trended upward postimplementation. Productivity significantly declined for counseling staff; there was a nonsignificant productivity decline for medical services staff and a nonsignificant productivity increase for case manager staff. Revenue per capita staff increased by 0.6%, while cost per patient visit increased by 5.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite less robust results than expected, had we not implemented the electronic system, recent changes in documentation and reimbursement for services would have paralyzed our agency.
Authors: Antonios Likourezos; Donald B Chalfin; Daniel G Murphy; Barbara Sommer; Kelly Darcy; Steven J Davidson Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Sowmya R Rao; Karen Donelan; Timothy G Ferris; Ashish Jha; Rainu Kaushal; Douglas E Levy; Sara Rosenbaum; Alexandra E Shields; David Blumenthal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ben Louie; Steven Kritz; Lawrence S Brown; Melissa Chu; Charles Madray; Roberto Zavala Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Samuel J Wang; Blackford Middleton; Lisa A Prosser; Christiana G Bardon; Cynthia D Spurr; Patricia J Carchidi; Anne F Kittler; Robert C Goldszer; David G Fairchild; Andrew J Sussman; Gilad J Kuperman; David W Bates Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-10-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Maria Gabriela Uribe Guajardo; Andrew Baillie; Eva Louie; Vicki Giannopoulos; Katie Wood; Ben Riordan; Paul Haber; Kirsten Morley Journal: J Multimorb Comorb Date: 2022-04-23