Literature DB >> 15492216

Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation.

Bin Qian1, Angel R Ortiz, David Baker.   

Abstract

Accurate high-resolution refinement of protein structure models is a formidable challenge because of the delicate balance of forces in the native state, the difficulty in sampling the very large number of alternative tightly packed conformations, and the inaccuracies in current force fields. Indeed, energy-based refinement of comparative models generally leads to degradation rather than improvement in model quality, and, hence, most current comparative modeling procedures omit physically based refinement. However, despite their inaccuracies, current force fields do contain information that is orthogonal to the evolutionary information on which comparative models are based, and, hence, refinement might be able to improve comparative models if the space that is sampled is restricted sufficiently so that false attractors are avoided. Here, we use the principal components of the variation of backbone structures within a homologous family to define a small number of evolutionarily favored sampling directions and show that model quality can be improved by energy-based optimization along these directions.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15492216      PMCID: PMC524448          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0404703101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

Review 1.  Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis.

Authors:  J Skolnick; J S Fetrow; A Kolinski
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

3.  Comparative protein structure modeling. Introduction and practical examples with modeller.

Authors:  R Sánchez; A Sali
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Protein structure modeling for structural genomics.

Authors:  R Sánchez; U Pieper; F Melo; N Eswar; M A Martí-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; N Mirković; A Sali
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-11

Review 5.  Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M A Martí-Renom; A C Stuart; A Fiser; R Sánchez; F Melo; A Sali
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2000

6.  Pushing the boundaries of molecular replacement with maximum likelihood.

Authors:  R J Read
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2001-09-21

7.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Global efforts in structural genomics.

Authors:  R C Stevens; S Yokoyama; I A Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences.

Authors:  R L Dunbrack; F E Cohen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  25 in total

1.  An analysis of core deformations in protein superfamilies.

Authors:  Alejandra Leo-Macias; Pedro Lopez-Romero; Dmitry Lupyan; Daniel Zerbino; Angel R Ortiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 3.  Advances in homology protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Zhexin Xiang
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  vGNM: a better model for understanding the dynamics of proteins in crystals.

Authors:  Guang Song; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Prediction and design of macromolecular structures and interactions.

Authors:  David Baker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL.

Authors:  Xiaoran Fu; James R Apgar; Amy E Keating
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Algorithmic dimensionality reduction for molecular structure analysis.

Authors:  W Michael Brown; Shawn Martin; Sara N Pollock; Evangelos A Coutsias; Jean-Paul Watson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling.

Authors:  Per Larsson; Björn Wallner; Erik Lindahl; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  The overlap of small molecule and protein binding sites within families of protein structures.

Authors:  Fred P Davis; Andrej Sali
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  SELECTpro: effective protein model selection using a structure-based energy function resistant to BLUNDERs.

Authors:  Arlo Randall; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.