Literature DB >> 17597151

Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL.

Xiaoran Fu1, James R Apgar, Amy E Keating.   

Abstract

Computational protein design can be used to select sequences that are compatible with a fixed-backbone template. This strategy has been used in numerous instances to engineer novel proteins. However, the fixed-backbone assumption severely restricts the sequence space that is accessible via design. For challenging problems, such as the design of functional proteins, this may not be acceptable. Here, we present a method for introducing backbone flexibility into protein design calculations and apply it to the design of diverse helical BH3 ligands that bind to the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL, a member of the Bcl-2 protein family. We demonstrate how normal mode analysis can be used to sample different BH3 backbones, and show that this leads to a larger and more diverse set of low-energy solutions than can be achieved using a native high-resolution Bcl-xL complex crystal structure as a template. We tested several of the designed solutions experimentally and found that this approach worked well when normal mode calculations were used to deform a native BH3 helix structure, but less well when they were used to deform an idealized helix. A subsequent round of design and testing identified a likely source of the problem as inadequate sampling of the helix pitch. In all, we tested 17 designed BH3 peptide sequences, including several point mutants. Of these, eight bound well to Bcl-xL and four others showed weak but detectable binding. The successful designs showed a diversity of sequences that would have been difficult or impossible to achieve using only a fixed backbone. Thus, introducing backbone flexibility via normal mode analysis effectively broadened the set of sequences identified by computational design, and provided insight into positions important for binding Bcl-xL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17597151      PMCID: PMC1994813          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  72 in total

1.  Branch-and-terminate: a combinatorial optimization algorithm for protein design.

Authors:  D B Gordon; S L Mayo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

3.  Prediction of amino acid sequence from structure.

Authors:  K Raha; A M Wollacott; M J Italia; J R Desjarlais
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Chimeric (alpha/beta + alpha)-peptide ligands for the BH3-recognition cleft of Bcl-XL: critical role of the molecular scaffold in protein surface recognition.

Authors:  Jack D Sadowsky; Margaret A Schmitt; Hee-Seung Lee; Naoki Umezawa; Shaomeng Wang; York Tomita; Samuel H Gellman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 6.  Computer-based design of novel protein structures.

Authors:  Glenn L Butterfoss; Brian Kuhlman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2006

7.  Studies leading to potent, dual inhibitors of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL.

Authors:  Milan Bruncko; Thorsten K Oost; Barbara A Belli; Hong Ding; Mary K Joseph; Aaron Kunzer; Darlene Martineau; William J McClellan; Michael Mitten; Shi-Chung Ng; Paul M Nimmer; Tilman Oltersdorf; Cheol-Min Park; Andrew M Petros; Alexander R Shoemaker; Xiaohong Song; Xilu Wang; Michael D Wendt; Haichao Zhang; Stephen W Fesik; Saul H Rosenberg; Steven W Elmore
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Distinct BH3 domains either sensitize or activate mitochondrial apoptosis, serving as prototype cancer therapeutics.

Authors:  Anthony Letai; Michael C Bassik; Loren D Walensky; Mia D Sorcinelli; Solly Weiler; Stanley J Korsmeyer
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design.

Authors:  Julia M Shifman; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor.

Authors:  Frank V Cochran; Sophia P Wu; Wei Wang; Vikas Nanda; Jeffery G Saven; Michael J Therien; William F DeGrado
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  43 in total

1.  Experimental library screening demonstrates the successful application of computational protein design to large structural ensembles.

Authors:  Benjamin D Allen; Alex Nisthal; Stephen L Mayo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein backbone ensemble generation explores the local structural space of unseen natural homologs.

Authors:  Christian D Schenkelberg; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction.

Authors:  Colin A Smith; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Designing specific protein-protein interactions using computation, experimental library screening, or integrated methods.

Authors:  T Scott Chen; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Mcl-1-Bim complexes accommodate surprising point mutations via minor structural changes.

Authors:  Emiko Fire; Stefano V Gullá; Robert A Grant; Amy E Keating
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Role of protein flexibility in the design of Bcl-X(L) targeting agents: insight from molecular dynamics.

Authors:  William Novak; Hongming Wang; Goran Krilov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Computational redesign of the SHV-1 beta-lactamase/beta-lactamase inhibitor protein interface.

Authors:  Kimberly A Reynolds; Melinda S Hanes; Jodi M Thomson; Andrew J Antczak; James M Berger; Robert A Bonomo; Jack F Kirsch; Tracy M Handel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  What induces pocket openings on protein surface patches involved in protein-protein interactions?

Authors:  Susanne Eyrisch; Volkhard Helms
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions.

Authors:  Daniel J Mandell; Tanja Kortemme
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Design of peptide inhibitors that bind the bZIP domain of Epstein-Barr virus protein BZLF1.

Authors:  T Scott Chen; Aaron W Reinke; Amy E Keating
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.