Literature DB >> 10984534

Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures.

B Kuhlman1, D Baker.   

Abstract

How large is the volume of sequence space that is compatible with a given protein structure? Starting from random sequences, low free energy sequences were generated for 108 protein backbone structures by using a Monte Carlo optimization procedure and a free energy function based primarily on Lennard-Jones packing interactions and the Lazaridis-Karplus implicit solvation model. Remarkably, in the designed sequences 51% of the core residues and 27% of all residues were identical to the amino acids in the corresponding positions in the native sequences. The lowest free energy sequences obtained for ensembles of native-like backbone structures were also similar to the native sequence. Furthermore, both the individual residue frequencies and the covariances between pairs of positions observed in the very large SH3 domain family were recapitulated in core sequences designed for SH3 domain structures. Taken together, these results suggest that the volume of sequence space optimal for a protein structure is surprisingly restricted to a region around the native sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984534      PMCID: PMC27033          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

1.  Two exposed amino acid residues confer thermostability on a cold shock protein.

Authors:  D Perl; U Mueller; U Heinemann; F X Schmid
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-05

2.  Trading accuracy for speed: A quantitative comparison of search algorithms in protein sequence design.

Authors:  C A Voigt; D B Gordon; S L Mayo
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant.

Authors:  S M Malakauskas; S L Mayo
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1998-06

4.  The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning.

Authors:  J Desmet; M De Maeyer; B Hazes; I Lasters
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Who checks the checkers? Four validation tools applied to eight atomic resolution structures. EU 3-D Validation Network.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Simplified proteins: minimalist solutions to the 'protein folding problem'.

Authors:  K W Plaxco; D S Riddle; V Grantcharova; D Baker
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  The HSSP database of protein structure-sequence alignments and family profiles.

Authors:  C Dodge; R Schneider; C Sander
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection.

Authors:  B I Dahiyat; S L Mayo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space.

Authors:  P Koehl; M Levitt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-12       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Mutagenesis of a buried polar interaction in an SH3 domain: sequence conservation provides the best prediction of stability effects.

Authors:  K L Maxwell; A R Davidson
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  343 in total

1.  De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data.

Authors:  P M Bowers; C E Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Protein topology and stability define the space of allowed sequences.

Authors:  Patrice Koehl; Michael Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conversion of monomeric protein L to an obligate dimer by computational protein design.

Authors:  B Kuhlman; J W O'Neill; D E Kim; K Y Zhang; D Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes.

Authors:  Tanja Kortemme; David Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Analysis of protein sequence/structure similarity relationships.

Authors:  Hin Hark Gan; Rebecca A Perlow; Sharmili Roy; Joy Ko; Min Wu; Jing Huang; Shixiang Yan; Angelo Nicoletta; Jonathan Vafai; Ding Sun; Lihua Wang; Joyce E Noah; Samuela Pasquali; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  A chimeric HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimer with an embedded granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) domain induces enhanced antibody and T cell responses.

Authors:  Thijs van Montfort; Mark Melchers; Gözde Isik; Sergey Menis; Po-Ssu Huang; Katie Matthews; Elizabeth Michael; Ben Berkhout; William R Schief; John P Moore; Rogier W Sanders
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Local complexity of amino acid interactions in a protein core.

Authors:  Rajul K Jain; Rama Ranganathan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Crystal structures and increased stabilization of the protein G variants with switched folding pathways NuG1 and NuG2.

Authors:  Sehat Nauli; Brian Kuhlman; Isolde Le Trong; Ronald E Stenkamp; David Teller; David Baker
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles.

Authors:  Stefan M Larson; Jeremy L England; John R Desjarlais; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Folding free energy function selects native-like protein sequences in the core but not on the surface.

Authors:  Alfonso Jaramillo; Lorenz Wernisch; Stéphanie Héry; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.