Literature DB >> 1959265

A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

B T Rougraff1, D A Heck, A E Gibson.   

Abstract

An historical prospective study was performed to compare two surgical management alternatives in the treatment of patients with knee arthritis. There were 120 unicompartmental and 81 tricompartmental knee arthroplasties in 98 and 66 patients, respectively. All living patients were available for follow-up observation, and survivorship data on all arthroplasties were obtained. The average follow-up interval was 78 months (range, eight-162 months) in the unicompartmental series and 68 months (range, two- 186 months) in the tricompartmental group. Patients receiving the unicompartmental arthroplasty were treated with nonmetal-backed polyethylene tibial components. Prosthetic survivorship was 92% at ten years in the unicompartmental patient group. There were no statistically significant differences in aseptic loosening between these two patient groups. In appropriately selected patients unicompartmental arthroplasty was associated with better range of motion and ambulatory function than patients being treated with tricompartmental knee replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1959265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study.

Authors:  Andrea Ensini; Paolo Barbadoro; Alberto Leardini; Fabio Catani; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Andrew Price; Robin Allum
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; M Clarius; D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Clinical and functional comparison of uni- and bicondylar sledge prostheses.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C O Tibesku; D Frisse; M Genkinger; H Laass; D Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  UKA closely preserves natural knee kinematics in vitro.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Bilal F El-Zayat; Ronny De Corte; Yan Chevalier; Lennart Scheys; Bernardo Innocenti; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Luc Labey
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Simultaneous ipsilateral knee arthroscopy and unicondylar knee arthroplasty is effective for bicompartmental symptoms.

Authors:  Akshay Lakra; Taylor Murtaugh; Jeffrey A Geller; William Macaulay; Roshan P Shah
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-08-09

9.  Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Gilles Estour; Charbel Nemer; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Analysis of revision procedures for failed unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  K O Oduwole; M K Sayana; F Onayemi; T McCarthy; J O'Byrne
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.