Literature DB >> 11740750

Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision.

A J Price1, J Webb, H Topf, C A Dodd, J W Goodfellow, D W Murray.   

Abstract

Forty Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasties (UCAs) were performed through a short incision medial to the patellar tendon, without dislocation of the patella, using updated instruments (Oxford Knee Phase III, Biomet Ltd., Bridgend, UK). The rate of recovery of these knees (measured by the time taken to achieve straight-leg raising, 70 degrees of flexion, and independent stair climbing) was compared with that of 20 Oxford UCAs performed through an open approach with dislocation of the patella. Both groups were compared with 40 AGC (Biomet) total knee arthroplasties performed for osteoarthritis during the same time period. The average rate of recovery after the short-incision UCA was twice as fast as after open UCA and 3 times as fast as after total knee arthroplasty. Accuracy of implantation, assessed from 11 variables seen on fluoroscopically centered postoperative radiographs, was the same after UCA by the short-incision approach as after the open approach, suggesting that the short-term advantage of increased speed of recovery was gained without affecting the long-term results. We now employ the short incision with the phase III instruments for all UCAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11740750     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.25552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  84 in total

1.  [The minimally invasive unicompartmental knee system "Preservation"First clinical results and analysis of complications].

Authors:  D P König; F Popken; W Herzberg; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 3.  Management of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Andrew Price; Robin Allum
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

5.  Survival analysis and functional outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement up to 11 years follow up at a District General Hospital.

Authors:  M Edmondson; A Atrey; D East; N Ellens; K Miles; R Goddard; H Apthorp; A Butler-Manuel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-05-18

6.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; M Clarius; D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  [Minimally invasive mini-midvastus approach as standard in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  M Pietsch; O Djahani; S Hofmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Patient-perceived outcome measures following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with mini-incision.

Authors:  I Jahromi; N P Walton; P J Dobson; P L Lewis; D G Campbell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.