Literature DB >> 1544958

Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee.

J N Argenson1, J J O'Connor.   

Abstract

We recovered 23 meniscal bearings from 18 failed bicompartmental Oxford knee prostheses. They had been implanted for one to nine years. The minimum thickness of the retrieved bearings was measured and compared with the thickness of 25 unused bearings. The mean penetration rate, calculated by two methods, was either 0.043 or 0.026 mm per annum. This compares with 0.19 mm per annum reported for the Charnley hip. The use of a fully congruous meniscal bearing prosthesis can reduce wear in knee arthroplasty to a very low rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1544958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  22 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Letter to the Editor: The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kartik Logishetty; Gareth G Jones; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The John Insall Award: no functional advantage of a mobile bearing posterior stabilized TKA.

Authors:  Ormonde M Mahoney; Tracy L Kinsey; Theresa J D'Errico; Jianhua Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; M Clarius; D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [In vivo biomechanics of unicondylar knee replacement performed using minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  J-N A Argenson; R D Komistek; S Akizuki
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Vanessa Pauly; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac; Jean-Noel A Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  New total knee arthroplasty designs: do young patients notice?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Denis Nam; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Douglas A Dennis; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  An uncommon cause of cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure: fracture of metallic components.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Cesare Chemello; Chris Pullen; Pietro Cerveri; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.