Literature DB >> 15467036

Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Laurel A Habel1, James J Dignam, Stephanie R Land, Martine Salane, Angela M Capra, Thomas B Julian.   

Abstract

Women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are at substantially increased risk for a second breast cancer, but few strong predictors for these subsequent tumors have been identified. We used Cox regression modeling to examine the association between mammographic density at diagnosis of DCIS of 504 women from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17 trial and risk of subsequent breast cancer events. In this group of patients, mostly 50 years old or older, approximately 6.6% had breasts categorized as highly dense (i.e., > or =75% of the breast occupied by dense tissue). After adjusting for treatment with radiotherapy, age, and body mass index, women with highly dense breasts had 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 6.1) times the risk of subsequent breast cancer (DCIS or invasive), 3.2 (95% CI = 1.2 to 8.5) times the risk of invasive breast cancer, and 3.0 (95% CI = 1.2 to 7.5) times the risk of any ipsilateral breast cancer, compared with women with less than 25% of the breast occupied by dense tissue. Our results provide initial evidence that the risk of second breast cancers may be increased among DCIS patients with highly dense breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15467036      PMCID: PMC2935469          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djh260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  45 in total

1.  Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography.

Authors:  Virginia L Ernster; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; William E Barlow; Yingye Zheng; Donald L Weaver; Gary Cutter; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Robert Rosenberg; Patricia A Carney; Karla Kerlikowske; Stephen H Taplin; Nicole Urban; Berta M Geller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Some evidence refuting the HMO "favorable selection" hypothesis: the case of Kaiser Permanente.

Authors:  N P Gordon; G A Kaplan
Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res       Date:  1991

3.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma.

Authors:  E R Fisher; J Dignam; E Tan-Chiu; J Costantino; B Fisher; S Paik; N Wolmark
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: trends in geographic, temporal, and demographic patterns of care and survival.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Tulin Cil; Eve Fishell; Wedad Hanna; Ping Sun; Ellen Rawlinson; Steven A Narod; David R McCready
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine C Park; James Rembert; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  A nested case-control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States).

Authors:  I Kato; C Beinart; A Bleich; S Su; M Kim; P G Toniolo
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Serum concentrations of DDE, PCBs, and other persistent organic pollutants and mammographic breast density in Triana, Alabama, a highly exposed population.

Authors:  J A Rusiecki; H Denic-Roberts; C Byrne; J Cash; C F Raines; L A Brinton; S H Zahm; T Mason; M R Bonner; A Blair; R Hoover
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Reduction of breast density following tamoxifen treatment evaluated by 3-D MRI: preliminary study.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Yeun-Chung Chang; Daniel Chang; Yi-Ting Wang; Ke Nie; Ruey-Feng Chang; Orhan Nalcioglu; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Three-dimensional-engineered matrix to study cancer stem cells and tumorsphere formation: effect of matrix modulus.

Authors:  Xiaoming Yang; Samaneh K Sarvestani; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Xuezhong He; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy G Woolcott; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Physical activity, body mass index, and mammographic density in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Melinda L Irwin; Erin J Aiello; Anne McTiernan; Leslie Bernstein; Frank D Gilliland; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Age at diagnosis predicts local recurrence in women treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based outcomes analysis.

Authors:  I Kong; S A Narod; C Taylor; L Paszat; R Saskin; S Nofech-Moses; D Thiruchelvam; W Hanna; J P Pignol; S Sengupta; L Elavathil; P A Jani; S J Done; S Metcalfe; E Rakovitch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Mammographic breast density response to aromatase inhibition.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Vera J Suman; Kathleen R Brandt; Matthew L Kosel; Aman U Buzdar; Janet E Olson; Fang-Fang Wu; Lynn M Flickinger; Giske Ursin; Catherine R Elliott; Lois Shepherd; Richard M Weinshilboum; Paul E Goss; James N Ingle
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Sex steroid metabolism polymorphisms and mammographic density in pre- and early perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Mary E Sehl; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Laurel A Habel; Lesley M Butler; Maryfran R Sowers; Gail A Greendale; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Matrix density-induced mechanoregulation of breast cell phenotype, signaling and gene expression through a FAK-ERK linkage.

Authors:  P P Provenzano; D R Inman; K W Eliceiri; P J Keely
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.