Literature DB >> 10430251

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma.

E R Fisher1, J Dignam, E Tan-Chiu, J Costantino, B Fisher, S Paik, N Wolmark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report is an 8-year update of the authors' previous findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17, which relates to the influence of pathologic characteristics on the natural history and treatment of intraductal carcinoma (DCIS).
METHODS: Nine pathologic features observed in a pathologic subset of 623 of 814 evaluable women enrolled in this randomized clinical trial were assessed for their role in the prediction of second ipsilateral breast tumors (IBT), other events, and selection of breast irradiation (XRT) following lumpectomy.
RESULTS: The frequency of subsequent IBT was reduced from 31% to 13% (P = 0.0001) by XRT. The average annual hazard rates for IBT were reduced by XRT for all pathologic features examined. Four characteristics were individually noted to be significantly related to IBT, but only moderate-to-marked and absent-to-slight comedo necrosis were found to be independent high and low risk predictors, respectively, for such an event in patients of both treatment groups. XRT effected a 7% absolute reduction at 8 years in the low risk group. Despite a relatively high incidence (approximately 40%) of IBT consisting of invasive cancer, mortality due to breast carcinoma after DCIS for the entire cohort was found to be only 1.6% at 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of comedo necrosis in patients with DCIS appears to be sufficient for discriminating between high and low risks for IBT following lumpectomy for DCIS. Although margin status, unlike in our previous report, was found to have only a slight or borderline influence on the frequency of IBT at 8 years, excision of DCIS with free margins is advised. The low risk group exhibits a statistically significant reduction of IBT from XRT. The decision to forgo XRT in the treatment of this singular subset of patients would appear to depend on clinical considerations and the input of informed patients rather than being standard practice. [See editorial on pages 375-7, this issue.]

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430251     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<429::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  93 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  An adequate margin of excision in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Malcolm R Kell; Monica Morrow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

3.  The landmark surgical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project.

Authors:  D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Young age is not associated with increased local recurrence for DCIS treated by breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Gary M Freedman; Tianyu Li; Penny R Anderson; Ramona Swaby; Nicos Nicolaou; Lori Goldstein; Elin R Sigurdson; Richard J Bleicher
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors.

Authors:  Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Caroline Miller; Krystyna Kozakeiwicz; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Joseph Rabban; Yunn Yi Chen; Karla Kerlikowske; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy or lumpectomy? The choice of operation for clinical stages I and II breast cancer (summary of the 2002 update).

Authors:  Hugh Scarth; Jacques Cantin; Mark Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  M Luke Marinovich; Lamiae Azizi; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Monica Morrow; Lawrence J Solin; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Regulation of in situ to invasive breast carcinoma transition.

Authors:  Min Hu; Jun Yao; Danielle K Carroll; Stanislawa Weremowicz; Haiyan Chen; Daniel Carrasco; Andrea Richardson; Shelia Violette; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Erica L Bauerlein; William C Hahn; Rebecca S Gelman; Craig Allred; Mina J Bissell; Stuart Schnitt; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 9.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation after conservative surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Henry M Kuerer; Thomas B Julian; Eric A Strom; H Kim Lyerly; Armando E Giuliano; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Frank A Vicini
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Declining recurrence among ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with breast-conserving surgery in the community setting.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Ninah S Achacoso; Reina Haque; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Suzanne W Fletcher; Stuart J Schnitt; Laura C Collins; Ann M Geiger; Balaram Puligandla; Luana Acton; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.