PURPOSE: Mammographic breast density (MBD) is decreased by tamoxifen, but the effect of aromatase inhibitors is less clear. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We enrolled early-stage postmenopausal patients with breast cancer initiating adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy and ascertained mammograms before and at an average 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. We matched cases to healthy postmenopausal women (controls) from a large mammography screening cohort on age, baseline body mass index, baseline MBD, and interval between mammograms. We estimated change in MBD using a computer-assisted thresholding program (Cumulus) and compared differences between cases and matched controls. RESULTS: In predominantly White women (96%), we found 14% of the 387 eligible cases had a MBD reduction of at least 5% after an average of 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. MBD reductions were associated with higher baseline MBD, aromatase inhibitor use for more than 12 months, and prior postmenopausal hormone use. Comparing each case with her matched control, there was no evidence of an association of change in MBD with aromatase inhibitor therapy [median case-control difference among 369 pairs was -0.1% (10th and 90th percentile: -5.9%, 5.2%) P = 0.51]. Case-control differences were similar by type of aromatase inhibitor (P's 0.41 and 0.56); prior use of postmenopausal hormones (P = 0.85); baseline MBD (P = 0.55); and length of aromatase inhibitor therapy (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors, 14% of cases had a MBD reduction of more than 5%, but these decreases did not differ from matched controls. These data suggest that MBD is not a clinically useful biomarker for predicting the value of aromatase inhibitor therapy in White postmenopausal women.
PURPOSE: Mammographic breast density (MBD) is decreased by tamoxifen, but the effect of aromatase inhibitors is less clear. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We enrolled early-stage postmenopausal patients with breast cancer initiating adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy and ascertained mammograms before and at an average 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. We matched cases to healthy postmenopausal women (controls) from a large mammography screening cohort on age, baseline body mass index, baseline MBD, and interval between mammograms. We estimated change in MBD using a computer-assisted thresholding program (Cumulus) and compared differences between cases and matched controls. RESULTS: In predominantly White women (96%), we found 14% of the 387 eligible cases had a MBD reduction of at least 5% after an average of 10 months of aromatase inhibitor therapy. MBD reductions were associated with higher baseline MBD, aromatase inhibitor use for more than 12 months, and prior postmenopausal hormone use. Comparing each case with her matched control, there was no evidence of an association of change in MBD with aromatase inhibitor therapy [median case-control difference among 369 pairs was -0.1% (10th and 90th percentile: -5.9%, 5.2%) P = 0.51]. Case-control differences were similar by type of aromatase inhibitor (P's 0.41 and 0.56); prior use of postmenopausal hormones (P = 0.85); baseline MBD (P = 0.55); and length of aromatase inhibitor therapy (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women treated with aromatase inhibitors, 14% of cases had a MBD reduction of more than 5%, but these decreases did not differ from matched controls. These data suggest that MBD is not a clinically useful biomarker for predicting the value of aromatase inhibitor therapy in White postmenopausal women.
Authors: Laurel A Habel; Angela M Capra; Ninah S Achacoso; Aradhana Janga; Luana Acton; Balaram Puligandla; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Celine M Vachon; Hironobu Sasano; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; David A Watson; Carol Reynolds; Wilma L Lingle; Paul E Goss; Rong Li; Sarah E Aiyar; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Richard J Santen; James N Ingle Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: James N Ingle; Aman U Buzdar; Daniel J Schaid; Matthew P Goetz; Anthony Batzler; Mark E Robson; Donald W Northfelt; Janet E Olson; Edith A Perez; Zeruesenay Desta; Randy A Weintraub; Clark V Williard; David A Flockhart; Richard M Weinshilboum Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: T Cigler; H Richardson; M J Yaffe; C J Fabian; D Johnston; J N Ingle; E Nassif; R L Brunner; M E Wood; J L Pater; H Hu; S Qi; D Tu; P E Goss Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-01-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Tulin Cil; Eve Fishell; Wedad Hanna; Ping Sun; Ellen Rawlinson; Steven A Narod; David R McCready Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: T Cigler; D Tu; M J Yaffe; B Findlay; S Verma; D Johnston; H Richardson; H Hu; S Qi; P E Goss Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-12-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Mitch Dowsett; John F Forbes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-11-17 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Jim Ingle; Alan Coates; John Forbes; Judith Bliss; Marc Buyse; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Marco Colleoni; Charles Coombes; Claire Snowdon; Michael Gnant; Raimund Jakesz; Manfred Kaufmann; Francesco Boccardo; Jon Godwin; Christina Davies; Richard Peto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janet E Olson; Thomas A Sellers; Christopher G Scott; Beth A Schueler; Kathleen R Brandt; Daniel J Serie; Matthew R Jensen; Fang-Fang Wu; Marilyn J Morton; John J Heine; Fergus J Couch; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Natalie J Engmann; Christopher G Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Serghei Malkov; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang Fang Wu; Stacey J Winham; Diana L Miglioretti; Aaron D Norman; John J Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Celine M Vachon; Karla Kerlikowske Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-08 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Margaret E Gatti-Mays; David Venzon; Claudia E Galbo; Andrea Singer; James Reynolds; Erini Makariou; Bhaskar Kallakury; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Larissa Korde; Claudine Isaacs; Robert Warren; Ann Gallagher; Jennifer Eng-Wong Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2016-01-12
Authors: Maeve Mullooly; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sarah J Nyante; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Marjorie Perloff; Ismail Jatoi; Louise A Brinton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Robert N Hoover; Andrew Glass; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Julia E McGuinness; Vicky Ro; Simukayi Mutasa; Samuel Pan; Jianhua Hu; Meghna S Trivedi; Melissa K Accordino; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman; Richard S Ha; Katherine D Crew Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Michael C S Bissell; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Jeffery A Tice; Charlotte C Gard; Katherine Y Tossas; Garth H Rauscher; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Louise M Henderson; Tracy Onega; Theresa H M Keegan; Diana L Miglioretti Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 4.254