Literature DB >> 19902459

Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery.

Tulin Cil1, Eve Fishell, Wedad Hanna, Ping Sun, Ellen Rawlinson, Steven A Narod, David R McCready.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with invasive breast cancer who are treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy face a cumulative risk of local disease recurrence of approximately 10% at 10 years. To the authors' knowledge, the role of mammographic density as a risk factor for the development of local recurrence has not been thoroughly evaluated to date.
METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for 335 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer and for whom a pretreatment mammogram was available. Information was recorded concerning mammographic density as well as tumor features, patient characteristics, and adjuvant treatments received. Patients were categorized for mammographic density based on the Wolfe classification as either low (<25% density), intermediate (25-50% density), or high (>50% density). A multivariate survival analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model with local disease recurrence as the primary endpoint.
RESULTS: Patients in the high mammographic density group experienced a much greater risk of local disease recurrence compared with women with the least dense breasts (10-year actuarial risks: 21% vs 5%; hazards ratio [HR], 5.7 [95% confidence interval, 1.6-20; P=.006]). The difference in the rates of disease recurrence at 10 years was pronounced for women who did not receive radiotherapy (40% vs 0% for patients with >50% density and <25% density, respectively; P<.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic breast density is an important risk factor for local breast cancer recurrence among women not receiving breast irradiation. Mammographic density should be taken into consideration when stratifying patients for clinical trials of partial breast radiotherapy. If confirmed, mammographic density might be used to help determine which patients might benefit from radiotherapy. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19902459     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  30 in total

1.  Early-onset breast cancer: what do we know about the risk factors?: A Countercurrents Series.

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Is breast cancer staging obsolete?

Authors:  S A Narod
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Prognostic value of mammographic breast density in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shereef Elsamany; Abdullah Alzahrani; Seham Abd Elkhalik; Omaima Elemam; Elham Rawah; Mian U Farooq; Musab H Almatrafi; Feras K Olayan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Oriented collagen fibers direct tumor cell intravasation.

Authors:  Weijing Han; Shaohua Chen; Wei Yuan; Qihui Fan; Jianxiang Tian; Xiaochen Wang; Longqing Chen; Xixiang Zhang; Weili Wei; Ruchuan Liu; Junle Qu; Yang Jiao; Robert H Austin; Liyu Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy G Woolcott; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Laura Ichikawa; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise A Brinton; Ghada N Farhat; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; Catherine Schairer; Stephen H Taplin; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; James J Dignam; Stephanie R Land; Martine Salane; Angela M Capra; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Bilateral breast cancers.

Authors:  Steven A Narod
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.