PURPOSE: To investigate the association between physical activity, body mass index (BMI), and mammographic density in a racially/ethnically diverse population-based sample of 522 postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer and enrolled in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. METHODS: We collected information on BMI and physical activity during a clinic visit 2 to 3 years after diagnosis. Weight and height were measured in a standard manner. Using an interview-administered questionnaire, participants recalled the type, duration, and frequency of physical activities they had performed in the last year. We estimated dense area and percentage density as a continuous measure using a computer-assisted software program from mammograms imaged approximately 1 to 2 years after diagnosis. Analysis of covariance methods were used to obtain mean density across WHO BMI categories and physical activity tertiles adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant decline in percentage density (P for trend = .0001), and mammographic dense area (P for trend = .0052), with increasing level of BMI adjusted for potential covariates. We observed a statistically significant decline in mammographic dense area (P for trend = .036) with increasing level of sports/recreational physical activity in women with a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2. Conversely, in women with a BMI less than 25 kg/m2, we observed a non-statistically significant increase in mammographic dense area and percentage density with increasing level of sports/recreational physical activity. CONCLUSION: Increasing physical activity among obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors may be a reasonable intervention approach to reduce mammographic density.
PURPOSE: To investigate the association between physical activity, body mass index (BMI), and mammographic density in a racially/ethnically diverse population-based sample of 522 postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage 0-IIIA breast cancer and enrolled in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study. METHODS: We collected information on BMI and physical activity during a clinic visit 2 to 3 years after diagnosis. Weight and height were measured in a standard manner. Using an interview-administered questionnaire, participants recalled the type, duration, and frequency of physical activities they had performed in the last year. We estimated dense area and percentage density as a continuous measure using a computer-assisted software program from mammograms imaged approximately 1 to 2 years after diagnosis. Analysis of covariance methods were used to obtain mean density across WHO BMI categories and physical activity tertiles adjusted for confounders. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant decline in percentage density (P for trend = .0001), and mammographic dense area (P for trend = .0052), with increasing level of BMI adjusted for potential covariates. We observed a statistically significant decline in mammographic dense area (P for trend = .036) with increasing level of sports/recreational physical activity in women with a BMI of at least 30 kg/m2. Conversely, in women with a BMI less than 25 kg/m2, we observed a non-statistically significant increase in mammographic dense area and percentage density with increasing level of sports/recreational physical activity. CONCLUSION: Increasing physical activity among obese postmenopausal breast cancer survivors may be a reasonable intervention approach to reduce mammographic density.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; M C Whitt; M L Irwin; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; D R Bassett; K H Schmitz; P O Emplaincourt; D R Jacobs; A S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erin J Aiello; Shelley S Tworoger; Yutaka Yasui; Frank Z Stanczyk; John Potter; Cornelia M Ulrich; Melinda Irwin; Anne McTiernan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Galina Lurie; Laurence N Kolonel Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Gail A Greendale; Shana L Palla; Giske Ursin; Gail A Laughlin; Carolyn Crandall; Malcolm C Pike; Beth A Reboussin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-09-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Fränzel J B Van Duijnhoven; Carla H Van Gils; Paulus A H Van Noord; Petra H M Peeters; Christine M Friedenreich; Evelyn M Monninkhof Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Christy G Woolcott; Kerry S Courneya; Norman F Boyd; Martin J Yaffe; Tim Terry; Anne McTiernan; Rollin Brant; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Melinda L Irwin; Charlotte A Jones; Sony Brar; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Kristina H Karvinen; Christine M Friedenreich Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ann Marie Flores; Jason Nelson; Lee Sowles; Rebecca G Stephenson; Kathryn Robinson; Andrea Cheville; Antoinette P Sander; William J Blot Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-03-10
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; Leslie Bernstein; Bruce W Hollis; Liren Xiao; Anita Ambs; Kathy Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Catherine Klifa; Adriana Pérez; Andrea M Kriska; Robin R High; Linda Snetselaar; Joanne F Dorgan Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; Marzieh Nojomi; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Frank Gilliland; Leslie Bernstein; Frank Stanczyk; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Anne McTiernan Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.900