Literature DB >> 18692323

High mammographic breast density is independent predictor of local but not distant recurrence after lumpectomy and radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer.

Catherine C Park1, James Rembert, Karen Chew, Dan Moore, Karla Kerlikowske.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biologically meaningful predictors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and radiotherapy (RT) are lacking. Tissue components, including extracellular matrix, could confer resistance to ionizing radiation. Fibroglandular and extracellular matrix components of breast tissue relative to adipose tissue can be quantified by the mammographic breast density (MBD), the proportion of dense area relative to the total breast area on mammography. We hypothesized that the MBD might be a predictor of LRR after BCS and RT for invasive breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a nested case-control study of 136 women with invasive breast cancer who had undergone BCS and RT and had had the MBD ascertained before, or at, diagnosis. Women with known recurrence were matched to women without recurrence by year of diagnosis. The median follow-up was 7.7 years. The percentage of MBD was measured using a computer-based threshold method.
RESULTS: Patients with a high MBD (>/=75% density) vs. low (</=25%) were at increased risk of LRR (hazard ratio, 4.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-021.0; p = 0.071) but not distant recurrence. In addition, we found a complete inverse correlation between high MBD and obesity (body mass index, >/=30 kg/m(2)). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, patients with MBD in the greatest quartile were at significantly greater risk of LRR (hazard ratio, 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-27.7; p = 0.01). Obesity without a high MBD also independently predicted for LRR (hazard ratio, 19.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-81.7; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that a high MBD and obesity are significant independent predictors of LRR after BCS and RT for invasive breast cancer. Additional studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692323     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  31 in total

Review 1.  A review of the influence of mammographic density on breast cancer clinical and pathological phenotype.

Authors:  Michael S Shawky; Cecilia W Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Michael A Henderson; Andrew Redfern
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Prognostic value of mammographic breast density in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shereef Elsamany; Abdullah Alzahrani; Seham Abd Elkhalik; Omaima Elemam; Elham Rawah; Mian U Farooq; Musab H Almatrafi; Feras K Olayan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Metastatic growth from dormant cells induced by a col-I-enriched fibrotic environment.

Authors:  Dalit Barkan; Lara H El Touny; Aleksandra M Michalowski; Jane Ann Smith; Isabel Chu; Anne Sally Davis; Joshua D Webster; Shelley Hoover; R Mark Simpson; Jack Gauldie; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthew W Conklin; Jens C Eickhoff; Kristin M Riching; Carolyn A Pehlke; Kevin W Eliceiri; Paolo P Provenzano; Andreas Friedl; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Does Breast Density Increase the Risk of Re-excision for Women with Breast Cancer Having Breast-Conservation Therapy?

Authors:  Siun M Walsh; Sandra B Brennan; Emily C Zabor; Laura H Rosenberger; Michelle Stempel; Lizza Lebron-Zapata; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy G Woolcott; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  Dense Breast Tissue as an Important Risk Factor for Breast Cancer and Implications for Early Detection.

Authors:  Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Mammographic Density and Prediction of Nodal Status in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  C C Hack; L Häberle; K Geisler; R Schulz-Wendtland; A Hartmann; P A Fasching; M Uder; D L Wachter; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; M P Lux; C Rauh; M W Beckmann; K Heusinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Integrin alpha2beta 1 (α2β1) promotes prostate cancer skeletal metastasis.

Authors:  Joseph L Sottnik; Stephanie Daignault-Newton; Xiaotun Zhang; Colm Morrissey; Maha H Hussain; Evan T Keller; Christopher L Hall
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; James J Dignam; Stephanie R Land; Martine Salane; Angela M Capra; Thomas B Julian
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.