Literature DB >> 22638637

An uncommon cause of cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure: fracture of metallic components.

Alfonso Manzotti1, Cesare Chemello, Chris Pullen, Pietro Cerveri, Norberto Confalonieri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite good overall clinical results, unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) are not without their problems and failures have been reported. The most common causes of UKR failure are component loosening, poor patient selection, poor surgical technique, polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis in other compartments. The purpose of this study is to present a series of atraumatic fractures of metallic components in a UKR treated in a single orthopaedic centre.
METHOD: Since 1999, 121 failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasties have been referred to our centre. In six of these, atraumatic breakage of a metal component in the cemented UKR was seen and included in this study. Pre-operative alignment, BMI and implant longevity were documented. The femoral implant failed in 4 patients and the tibial implant in a further 2.
RESULTS: All the femoral implant fractures occurred within 3 years of UKR surgery (mean: 22.2 months, SD: 10.6 months). Tibial implant breakage occurred at a mean of 8.5 years (SD: 2.4 months) following UKR. All patients were treated with conversion to a navigated total knee replacement. A primary total knee arthroplasty was used in all cases with one patient requiring a tibial component incorporating a wedge and stem following breakage of the original UKR tibial implant.
CONCLUSION: Fracture of the metallic components is a potential cause of failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In our experience, the incidence of this complication was 4.9 % of all UKR failures. Patients with a BMI greater than 30 and a progressive deterioration in limb alignment were at greater risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638637     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2062-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement survivorship and clinical experience over 21 years.

Authors:  T Ashraf; J H Newman; R L Evans; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-11

2.  Polyethylene thickness in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Krishna Lingaraj; Hayden Morris; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term success in middle-age and obese patients.

Authors:  Owen B Tabor; Owen B Tabor; Matthew Bernard; Jim Y Wan
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2005

4.  Failure mechanisms after unicompartmental and tricompartmental primary knee replacement with cement.

Authors:  O Furnes; B Espehaug; S A Lie; S E Vollset; L B Engesaeter; L I Havelin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement--a possible cause of pain.

Authors:  D J Simpson; A J Price; A Gulati; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Sebastien Parratte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A metal-backed, rotating-bearing patellar prosthesis to lower contact stress. An 11-year clinical study.

Authors:  F F Buechel; R A Rosa; M J Pappas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Fatigue failure of the femoral component of a unicompartmental knee.

Authors:  P M Sandborn; S D Cook; M A Kester; R J Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Revision of 33 unicompartmental knee prostheses using total knee arthroplasty: strategy and results.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Gilles Estour; Charbel Nemer; Pierre-Emmanuel Colle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Femoral component fracture due to osteolysis after cemented mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chang Dong Han; Chang Wook Han; Ik Hwan Yang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Magdalena M Gilg; Christian W Zeller; Lukas Leitner; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Labek; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial baseplate fracture associated with polyethylene wear and osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deniz Cankaya; Serdar Yilmaz; Alper Deveci; Bulent Ozkurt
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2013-12-21

3.  Patient outcomes in Anteromedial osteoarthritis patients over 80 years old undergoing Oxford Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty in China.

Authors:  Jingbo Cheng; Mingli Feng; Guanglei Cao; Zheng Li; Shuai An; Shibao Lu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Fracture of the Tibial Baseplate in Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Stuyts; Melanie Vandenberghe; Hans Van der Bracht; Yves Fortems; Elke Van den Eeden; Luc Cuypers
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2015-12-30

5.  Two pegs are better than one: rare mode of femoral component failure in unicompartmental arthroplasty requiring revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan Stancil; Nathan Summers; Douglas Van Citters; Adam Sassoon
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-11-22

6.  Fracture of the Femoral Component Caused by Insufficient Crimping after Modern Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishibashi; Tasuku Mashiba; Masaki Mori; Tetsuji Yamamoto
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-12-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.