Literature DB >> 15378542

BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention.

Aideen McInerney-Leo1, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Donald W Hadley, Ronald G Kase, Therese R Giambarresi, Elizabeth Johnson, Caryn Lerman, Jeffery P Struewing.   

Abstract

It remains uncertain whether members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families experience psychological distress with genetic testing and whether pre-test counseling can have a moderating effect on client well-being. One purpose of this study was to assess change in psychological well-being from baseline to 6-9 months follow-up and the effect of a problem-solving training (PST) intervention on psychological well-being. Two hundred and twelve members of 13 HBOC families were offered BRCA1/2 testing for a previously identified family mutation. Participants received education and were randomized to one of two counseling interventions; PST or client-centered counseling. Psychological well-being was assessed at baseline and again at 6-9 months following the receipt of test results, or at the equivalent time for those participants who chose not to undergo testing. Well-being was assessed using measures of depressive symptoms (CESD), intrusive thoughts (IES), cancer worries, and self-esteem. Comparisons were made between those who chose testing and those who did not as well as between those who received positive and negative test results. One hundred eighty one participants elected to undergo genetic testing (85%) and 47 of these (26%) were identified as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast and ovarian cancer worries decreased significantly (p = 0.007 and 0.008, respectively) in those who tested negative while there was no appreciable change in psychological well-being from baseline to follow-up in either those who tested positive or in non-testers. Among all participants, particularly testers, those randomized to PST had a greater reduction in depressive symptoms than those randomized to client-centered counseling (p < 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively). Regardless of the decision to test, individuals with a personal history of cancer (n = 22) were more likely to have an increase in breast cancer worries compared to those who had never been diagnosed with cancer (p < 0.001). Results suggest that a problem-solving counseling intervention may help to enhance psychological well-being following testing and that a personal history of cancer may increase psychological distress associated with genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15378542     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  13 in total

1.  Genetic testing for BRCA1: effects of a randomised study of knowledge provision on interest in testing and long term test uptake; implications for the NICE guidelines.

Authors:  Julia Hall; Susan Gray; Roger A'Hern; Susan Shanley; Maggie Watson; Kathryn Kash; Robert Croyle; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  A Rapid Systematic Review of Outcomes Studies in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Lisa Madlensky; Angela M Trepanier; Deborah Cragun; Barbara Lerner; Kristen M Shannon; Heather Zierhut
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Feasibility of Coping Effectiveness Training for Caregivers of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Genetic Counseling Intervention.

Authors:  Christy Haakonsen Smith; Erin Turbitt; John Muschelli; Lori Leonard; Katie L Lewis; Brian Freedman; Michelle Muratori; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Outcomes of Counseling after Education about Carrier Results: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Katie L Lewis; Kendall L Umstead; Jennifer J Johnston; Ilana M Miller; Lydia J Thompson; Kristen P Fishler; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial telephone counseling intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Lari Wenzel; Marc D Schwartz; George Luta; Paul Wileyto; Steven Narod; Beth N Peshkin; Alfred Marcus; David Cella; Susan Powell Emsbo; Denise Barnes; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Barbara B Biesecker; Katie L Lewis; Kendall L Umstead; Jennifer J Johnston; Erin Turbitt; Kristen P Fishler; John H Patton; Ilana M Miller; Alexis R Heidlebaugh; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Assess Outcomes of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Barbara A Athens; Samantha L Caldwell; Kendall L Umstead; Philip D Connors; Ethan Brenna; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  Interventions to improve patient education regarding multifactorial genetic conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine G Meilleur; Marguerite T Littleton-Kearney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ashley D Staton; Allison W Kurian; Kristin Cobb; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Problem-solving style and adaptation in breast cancer survivors: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  P Paul Heppner; Jane M Armer; Brent Mallinckrodt
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.