Literature DB >> 18679829

Genetic testing for BRCA1: effects of a randomised study of knowledge provision on interest in testing and long term test uptake; implications for the NICE guidelines.

Julia Hall1, Susan Gray, Roger A'Hern, Susan Shanley, Maggie Watson, Kathryn Kash, Robert Croyle, Rosalind Eeles.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interest in searching for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is high. Knowledge regarding these genes and the advantages and limitations of genetic testing is limited. It is unknown whether increasing knowledge about breast cancer genetic testing alters interest in testing.
METHODS: Three hundred and seventy nine women (260 with a family history of breast cancer; 119 with breast cancer) from The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust were randomised to receive or not receive written educational information on cancer genetics. A questionnaire was completed assessing interest in BRCA1 testing and knowledge on breast cancer genetics and screening. Actual uptake of BRCA1 testing is reported with a six year follow-up.
RESULTS: Eighty nine percent of women at risk of breast cancer and 76% of women with breast cancer were interested in BRCA1 testing (P < 0.0001). Provision of educational information did not affect level of interest. Knowledge about breast cancer susceptibility genes was poor. According to the NICE guidelines regarding eligibility for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, the families of 66% of the at risk group and 13% of the women with breast cancer would be eligible for testing (probability of BRCA1 mutation >or=20%). Within six years of randomisation, genetic testing was actually undertaken on 12 women, only 10 of whom would now be eligible, on the NICE guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: There is strong interest in BRCA1 testing. Despite considerable ignorance of factors affecting the inheritance of breast cancer, education neither reduced nor increased interest to undergo testing. The NICE guidelines successfully triage those with a high breast cancer risk to be managed in cancer genetics clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18679829     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9201-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  32 in total

1.  Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing.

Authors:  Julien Mancini; Catherine Noguès; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Valerie Bonadona; Agnès Chompret; Isabelle Coupier; François Eisinger; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Alain Lortholary; Tan Dat N'Guyen; Philippe Vennin; Hagay Sobol; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. The French Cancer Genetic Network.

Authors:  C Julian-Reynier; H Sobol; C Sévilla; C Noguès; P Bourret
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Jon Emery; Fiona Walter; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk.

Authors:  K Brain; P Norman; J Gray; C Rogers; R Mansel; P Harper
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-21       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Genetic testing for breast cancer: where are health care providers in the decision process?

Authors:  C M Velicer; S Taplin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  A randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducational intervention for women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  S Appleton; M Watson; R Rush; S Garcia-Minaur; M Porteous; J Campbell; E Anderson; A Cull
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of genetic testing decisions: a systematic review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Kate Sweeny; Arezou Ghane; Angela M Legg; Ho Phi Huynh; Sara E Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: a fuzzy-trace theory approach.

Authors:  Christopher R Wolfe; Valerie F Reyna; Colin L Widmer; Elizabeth M Cedillos; Christopher R Fisher; Priscila G Brust-Renck; Audrey M Weil
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 3.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

4.  Implementation of interventions targeting the uptake of genetic testing services for breast cancer risk: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Subash Thapa; Anja Leppin; Rikke Kristensen; Mette Just Bonde; Arja R Aro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.