P Paul Heppner1, Jane M Armer, Brent Mallinckrodt. 1. Department of Educational, School and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, 16 Hill Hall, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. HeppnerP@missouri.edu
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Emotional care of the breast cancer patient is not well understood; this lack of understanding results in both a high cost to the patient, as well as the health care system. This study examined the role of problem-solving style as a predictor of emotional distress, adjustment to breast cancer, and physical function immediately post-surgery and 12 months later. METHODS: The sample consisted of 121 women diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing surgery as a primary treatment. The survivors completed a measure of problem-solving style and three outcome measures immediately post-surgery, as well as at 1 year later. There was a 95.6% retention rate at 1 year. RESULTS: Multiple hierarchical regressions revealed, after controlling for patient demographics and stage of cancer, that problem-solving style (particularly personal control) was associated with emotional distress, adjustment to chronic illness, and physical function immediately following surgical intervention. In addition, a more positive problem-solving style was associated with less emotional distress, but not a better adaptation to a chronic illness or physical functioning 12 months later; the Personal Control again was the best single predictor of the emotional distress, adding 10% of the variance in predicting this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of post-surgery assessment may help identify those in need for problem-solving training to improve these outcomes at 1 year. Future studies need to determine the impact of interventions tailored to levels of problem-solving styles in cancer survivors over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding the role of problem solving style in breast cancer survivors deserves attention as it is associated with emotional distress immediately and one year after medical intervention. Problem-solving style should be evaluated early, and interventions established for those most at risk for emotional distress.
INTRODUCTION: Emotional care of the breast cancerpatient is not well understood; this lack of understanding results in both a high cost to the patient, as well as the health care system. This study examined the role of problem-solving style as a predictor of emotional distress, adjustment to breast cancer, and physical function immediately post-surgery and 12 months later. METHODS: The sample consisted of 121 women diagnosed with breast cancer and undergoing surgery as a primary treatment. The survivors completed a measure of problem-solving style and three outcome measures immediately post-surgery, as well as at 1 year later. There was a 95.6% retention rate at 1 year. RESULTS: Multiple hierarchical regressions revealed, after controlling for patient demographics and stage of cancer, that problem-solving style (particularly personal control) was associated with emotional distress, adjustment to chronic illness, and physical function immediately following surgical intervention. In addition, a more positive problem-solving style was associated with less emotional distress, but not a better adaptation to a chronic illness or physical functioning 12 months later; the Personal Control again was the best single predictor of the emotional distress, adding 10% of the variance in predicting this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of post-surgery assessment may help identify those in need for problem-solving training to improve these outcomes at 1 year. Future studies need to determine the impact of interventions tailored to levels of problem-solving styles in cancer survivors over time. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding the role of problem solving style in breast cancer survivors deserves attention as it is associated with emotional distress immediately and one year after medical intervention. Problem-solving style should be evaluated early, and interventions established for those most at risk for emotional distress.
Authors: J E Epping-Jordan; B E Compas; D M Osowiecki; G Oppedisano; C Gerhardt; K Primo; D N Krag Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Patricia A Ganz; Katherine A Desmond; Beth Leedham; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-01-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Susan M Allen; Ann C Shah; Arthur M Nezu; Christine Maguth Nezu; Desirée Ciambrone; Joseph Hogan; Vincent Mor Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marlyn Allicock; Lindsey Haynes-Maslow; La-Shell Johnson; William R Carpenter; Anissa I Vines; Denise G Belle; Ray Phillips; Michele W Cherry Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Samantha Teague; George J Youssef; Jacqui A Macdonald; Emma Sciberras; Adrian Shatte; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Chris Greenwood; Jennifer McIntosh; Craig A Olsson; Delyse Hutchinson Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Femke Jansen; Ruud H Brakenhoff; Rob J Baatenburg de Jong; Johannes A Langendijk; C René Leemans; Robert P Takes; Chris H J Terhaard; Jan H Smit; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 4.615