Literature DB >> 15378253

Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: more than a compromise.

Toni W Vomweg1, Andrea Teifke, R Peter Kunz, Christian Hintze, Alexander Hlawatsch, Annett Kern, Karl F Kreitner, Manfred Thelen.   

Abstract

The purpose was to combine T1-weighted 3D gradient echo sequences at low and high spatial resolution (and short and longer acquisition time, respectively) in two orientations without compromising signal/time curve analysis and to evaluate the incremental value of assessing architectural features in high resolution images in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography. T1-weighted 3D-FLASH sequences in a 1.5-T scanner (512 x 256 pixel matrix at high resolution; 256 x 128 pixels at low resolution sequences, 72 slices, 1.7-mm slice thickness, TR 8.8 ms, TE 4.5 ms, flip angle 25 degrees) were acquired in a special order during a single investigation. Three observers evaluated architectural features of 36 histopathologically proven lesions using high or low resolution images independently. Architectural features of each lesion were assessed by rating on two three-point scales. Kappa statistics verified the decrease of inter-observer variability. All observers improved assessment of architectural features regarding high resolution images in transversal and coronal orientation (observer A: eight positive, three negative corrections; B: 12/5; C: 16/4). Most positive corrections resulted from improved detection of morphologic criteria of malignancy. Mean inter-observer agreement significantly (P<0.05) increased from "slight" to "moderate" (mean weighted kappa increased from 0.185 to 0.422). This protocol at the charge of slightly enlarged time for measurement offers an elegant way to improve analysis of architectural features in MRM. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15378253     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2428-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  39 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data.

Authors:  A T Agoston; B L Daniel; R J Herfkens; D M Ikeda; R L Birdwell; S G Heiss; A M Sawyer-Glover
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [Standardization and acceleration of quantitative analysis of dynamic MR mammographies via parametric images and automatized ROI definition].

Authors:  C K Kuhl; H B Bieling; G Lutterbey; T Sommer; E Keller; H H Schild
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1996-06

4.  False-positive results in dynamic MR mammography. Causes, frequency, and methods to avoid.

Authors:  W A Kaiser
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.266

5.  Contrast-enhanced high in-plane resolution dynamic MRI of the breast. Are there advantages in comparison to standard dynamic MRI?

Authors:  Silvia Obenauer; Corinna Schorn; Bruno Stelter; Uwe Fischer; Eckhardt Grabbe
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Diagnostic potential of ultrafast contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast in hypervascularized lesions: are there advantages in comparison with standard dynamic MRI?

Authors:  C Schorn; U Fischer; S Luftner-Nagel; E Grabbe
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours.

Authors:  S Mussurakis; D L Buckley; P J Drew; J N Fox; P J Carleton; L W Turnbull; A Horsman
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.350

8.  Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 1.0 T.

Authors:  Andrea Teifke; Alexander Hlawatsch; Thomas Beier; Toni Werner Vomweg; Simin Schadmand; Markus Schmidt; Hans-Anton Lehr; Manfred Thelen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of dynamic MR imaging features of the breast.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Beata Boné; Peter Aspelin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  [VIBE with parallel acquisition technique - a novel approach to dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver].

Authors:  M Dobritz; T Radkow; M Nittka; W Bautz; F A Fellner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders.

Authors:  Eija Pääkkö; Heli Reinikainen; Eija-Leena Lindholm; Tarja Rissanen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of quantitative parametric analysis for characterization of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; C Stockamp; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; William F A Klein Zeggelink; H Jelle Teertstra; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Sara H Muller; Harry Bartelink; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: is parametric mapping superior to image subtraction in lesion detection?

Authors:  Kathinka D Kurz; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Reinhart Willers; Dirk Blondin; Ulrich Mödder; Andreas Saleh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.

Authors:  Courtney K Morrison; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Wendy B DeMartini; James H Holmes; Kang Wang; Ryan J Bosca; Frank R Korosec; Roberta M Strigel
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Breast MR imaging in women at high-risk of breast cancer. Is something changing in early breast cancer detection?

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Franca Podo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 5.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.