Literature DB >> 15711841

Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders.

Eija Pääkkö1, Heli Reinikainen, Eija-Leena Lindholm, Tarja Rissanen.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of low-field MRI in breast disorders by comparing it with high-field MRI and biopsy results. Twenty-eight consecutive patients who were able to undergo two magnetic resonance examinations on following days were examined by high-field and low-field MRI. After T1-weighted sagittal images had been obtained a dynamic 3D axial study was performed followed by the acquisition of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sagittal images. The images were analyzed separately by two radiologists paying attention to lesion morphology and enhancement kinetics. Six patients had problems in both breasts (34 breasts studied). The results were compared with biopsy results of 27 breasts. There were 16 malignant lesions, two fibroadenomas and nine other benign lesions. The inter-magnetic-resonance-scanner kappa value was 0.77 (substantial agreement), while the interobserver kappa value was 0.86 and 0.81 at low and high field, respectively (excellent agreement). The sensitivity was 100 and 100%, the specificity was 82 and 73% and the accuracy was 93 and 89% at low and high field, respectively. The mean lesion size was 2 cm and the smallest malignant lesion was 8 mm in diameter. Low-field MRI is a promising tool for breast imaging. Larger materials and smaller lesions are needed to evaluate its true sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15711841     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2664-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  MR-guided bone biopsy: preliminary report of a new guiding method.

Authors:  Risto Ojala; Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Rauli Klemola; Erkki Vahala; Lasse Jyrkinen; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Dynamics of contrast enhancement in MR imaging and power Doppler ultrasonography of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  H Reinikainen; E Pääkkö; I Suramo; M Päivänsalo; J Jauhiainen; T Rissanen
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.990

4.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  P F Liu; J F Debatin; R F Caduff; G Kacl; E Garzoli; G P Krestin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI.

Authors:  R D Muüller; J Barkhausen; W Sauerwein; R Langer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Prototype breast coil for MR-guided needle localization.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; A T Huynh; P Viehweg; W Hanke; H Requardt; I Paprosch
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma.

Authors:  E A Morris; L H Schwartz; D D Dershaw; K J van Zee; A F Abramson; L Liberman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; A Iozzelli; A Fausto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  5 in total

1.  MR-guided breast biopsy and hook wire marking using a low-field (0.23 T) scanner with optical instrument tracking.

Authors:  Roberto Blanco Sequeiros; Heli Reinikainen; Andreas M Blanco Sequeiros; Teuvo Vaara; Risto Ojala; Eija Pääkkö; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MRI-guided needle localization of suspicious breast lesions: results of a freehand technique.

Authors:  M A A J van den Bosch; B L Daniel; S Pal; K W Nowels; R L Birdwell; S S Jeffrey; D M Ikeda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging of claustrophobic or oversized patients using an open low-field magnet.

Authors:  M Calabrese; D Brizzi; L Carbonaro; M Chiaramondia; M A Kirchin; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Minimum Field Strength Simulator for Proton Density Weighted MRI.

Authors:  Ziyue Wu; Weiyi Chen; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.