Literature DB >> 15372193

Influence of scoring parameter settings on Agatston and volume scores for coronary calcification.

Peter M A van Ooijen1, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Jacqueline C M Witteman, Matthijs Oudkerk.   

Abstract

Current multi-detector CT and electron beam tomography (EBT) technology enables the evaluation of coronary calcification. Multiple software packages are available to quantify calcification using several scoring algorithms implementing user-definable scoring parameters. We investigated the effect of scoring parameters on the calcium score outcome. Three parameters (four-connected or eight-connected, lesion size threshold and interpolation) are evaluated. Their theoretical influence on the scoring outcome is shown using simplified examples. To evaluate the effect in real data, we performed calcium scoring on randomly chosen EBT scans from 50 participants in an epidemiological study. Both the Agatston and volume scores were calculated. Changing from eight-connected to four-connected connectivity decreased both Agatston and volume scores (mean variability Agatston 3.15% and volume score -3.52%). Decreasing the threshold from 4 to 2 pixels increased the calcium scores because smaller lesions were also selected as calcified plaques (mean variability Agatston 16.23% and volume score 18.66%). Finally, the use of interpolation had a large negative effect on the volume score (mean variability -29.67%) and almost no effect on the Agatston score. Parameter settings in software for quantification for coronary calcification affect the calcium score outcome. Therefore, parameter settings for calcium scoring should be standardized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15372193     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2479-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  19 in total

1.  Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by electron beam tomography.

Authors:  S Achenbach; D Ropers; S Möhlenkamp; A Schmermund; G Muschiol; J Groth; M Kusus; M Regenfus; W G Daniel; R Erbel; W Moshage
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT.

Authors:  B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; R Fischbach; A F Kopp; A Knez; S Schröder; U J Schöpf; A Crispin; E Klotz; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Coronary calcium does not accurately predict near-term future coronary events in high-risk adults.

Authors:  R C Detrano; N D Wong; T M Doherty; R M Shavelle; W Tang; L E Ginzton; M J Budoff; K A Narahara
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Causes of interscan variability of coronary artery calcium measurements at electron-beam CT.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Matthew J Budoff; Nan Zhuang; Janis Child; Hamid Bakhsheshi; Sivi Carson; Song-Shou Mao
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Interscan variation in coronary artery calcium quantification in a large asymptomatic patient population.

Authors:  H C Yoon; J G Goldin; L E Greaser; J Sayre; G C Fonarow
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium score cutpoints and severity of associated angiographic lumen stenosis.

Authors:  J A Rumberger; P F Sheedy; J F Breen; R S Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Comparison of two different software systems for electron-beam CT-derived quantification of coronary calcification.

Authors:  M Adamzik; A Schmermund; J E Reed; S Adamzik; T Behrenbeck; P F Sheedy
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Combined use of computed tomography coronary calcium scores and C-reactive protein levels in predicting cardiovascular events in nondiabetic individuals.

Authors:  Robert Park; Robert Detrano; Min Xiang; Paul Fu; Youhanna Ibrahim; Laurie LaBree; Stanley Azen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Coronary artery calcium evaluation by electron beam computed tomography and its relation to new cardiovascular events.

Authors:  N D Wong; J C Hsu; R C Detrano; G Diamond; H Eisenberg; J M Gardin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Identification of patients at increased risk of first unheralded acute myocardial infarction by electron-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  P Raggi; T Q Callister; B Cooil; Z X He; N J Lippolis; D J Russo; A Zelinger; J J Mahmarian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  16 in total

1.  Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: how accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume?

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Yun Shen; Yuji Akiyama; Nobuhiko Hirai; Kousuke Sasaki; Minoru Ishifuro; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A novel model to test accuracy and reproducibility of MDCT scan protocols for coronary calcium in vivo.

Authors:  Michael Rosol; Karina Sachdev; Christian N Enzweiler; Dylan C Kwait; Ryan Millea; James Titus; Jason Handwerker; Stephan Wicky; Stephen Achenbach; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  A method for calcium quantification by means of CT coronary angiography using 64-multidetector CT: very high correlation with Agatston and volume scores.

Authors:  Bernhard Glodny; Bettina Helmel; Thomas Trieb; Claudia Schenk; Bernadette Taferner; Verena Unterholzner; Alexander Strasak; Johannes Petersen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  The accuracy of 1- and 3-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring using multi-slice CT in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Georg Mühlenbruch; Ernst Klotz; Joachim E Wildberger; Ralf Koos; Marco Das; Matthias Niethammer; Christian Hohl; Dagmar Honnef; Christoph Thomas; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Influence of heart rate on coronary calcium scores: a multi-manufacturer phantom study.

Authors:  N R van der Werf; M J Willemink; T P Willems; R Vliegenthart; M J W Greuter; T Leiner
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Influence of a small field-of-view size on the detection of coronary artery calcifications with MSCT: in vitro and in vivo study.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Georg Mühlenbruch; Ralf Koos; Marco Das; Saskia Pohl; Sven Stanzel; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Technical Note: kV-independent coronary calcium scoring: A phantom evaluation of score accuracy and potential radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Shengzhen Tao; Emily Sheedy; Michael Bruesewitz; Nikkole Weber; Kyle Williams; Ahmed Halaweish; Bernhard Schmidt; Eric Williamson; Cynthia McCollough; Shuai Leng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Radiation dose values for various coronary calcium scoring protocols in dual-source CT.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas Betschart; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Measurement of coronary calcium scores by electron beam computed tomography or exercise testing as initial diagnostic tool in low-risk patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Christiane A Geluk; Riksta Dikkers; Patrick J Perik; René A Tio; Marco J W Götte; Hans L Hillege; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Janneke B Houwers; Tineke P Willems; Matthijs Oudkerk; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.