OBJECTIVE: We evaluated interscan variation in coronary artery calcium scores in a large screening population as determined by electron beam CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand patients (average age, 53 years; age range, 18-85 years) who were asymptomatic for coronary artery disease underwent two consecutive scans of the heart on an electron beam CT scanner. Scans were performed with ECG gating, breath-hold, 3-mm collimation, and 100-msec exposure. Two contiguous pixels with density values greater than 130 H were used as the minimum criterion for a calcific lesion. The calcium score was determined on a vessel-by-vessel basis for both scans of each patient. Interscan variation in calcium and vessels involved with calcification was evaluated on the basis of age, sex, and average calcium score. RESULTS: The percentage of difference between calcium scores in scans was 28.4% and 43.0% for women and men, respectively. For the individual epicardial arteries (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary), the percentage of difference for calcium scores was 20.2-24.2% for women and 30.5-44.9% for men. A difference between the two scans in at least one vessel of the total coronary arteries identified with calcium was noted in 31% of patients. CONCLUSION: Interscan variability in calcium scores may be important in the determination of risk stratification. Subjects with a nonzero calcium score may benefit from undergoing two scans at the time of initial imaging.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated interscan variation in coronary artery calcium scores in a large screening population as determined by electron beam CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One thousand patients (average age, 53 years; age range, 18-85 years) who were asymptomatic for coronary artery disease underwent two consecutive scans of the heart on an electron beam CT scanner. Scans were performed with ECG gating, breath-hold, 3-mm collimation, and 100-msec exposure. Two contiguous pixels with density values greater than 130 H were used as the minimum criterion for a calcific lesion. The calcium score was determined on a vessel-by-vessel basis for both scans of each patient. Interscan variation in calcium and vessels involved with calcification was evaluated on the basis of age, sex, and average calcium score. RESULTS: The percentage of difference between calcium scores in scans was 28.4% and 43.0% for women and men, respectively. For the individual epicardial arteries (left main, left anterior descending, circumflex, and right coronary), the percentage of difference for calcium scores was 20.2-24.2% for women and 30.5-44.9% for men. A difference between the two scans in at least one vessel of the total coronary arteries identified with calcium was noted in 31% of patients. CONCLUSION: Interscan variability in calcium scores may be important in the determination of risk stratification. Subjects with a nonzero calcium score may benefit from undergoing two scans at the time of initial imaging.
Authors: Peter M A van Ooijen; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Matthijs Oudkerk Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2004-09-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Tom D Newton; Hatem Mehrez; Kelly Wong; Ravi Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew Crean; Elsie Nguyen; Narinder Paul Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andreas Knez; Christoph Becker; Alexander Becker; Alexander Leber; Carl White; Maximilian Reiser; Gerhard Steinbeck Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Yoon Kyung Kim; Yon Mi Sung; So Hyun Cho; Young Nam Park; Hye-Young Choi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-08-02 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Noortje van der Bijl; Paul W de Bruin; Jacob Geleijns; Jeroen J Bax; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Lucia J M Kroft Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 2.357