Literature DB >> 15358076

Stopping the motion and sleuthing the flash-lag effect: spatial uncertainty is the key to perceptual mislocalization.

Ryota Kanai1, Bhavin R Sheth, Shinsuke Shimojo.   

Abstract

A moving object is perceived to lie beyond a static object presented at the same time at the same retinal location (flash-lag effect or FLE). Some studies report that if the moving stimulus stops moving (flash-terminated condition or FTC) the instant the flash occurs, a FLE does not occur. Other studies, using different stimuli, report that the FLE does, in fact, occur in the FTC. The FTC is thus a crucial turning point in theories of flash-lag. Unraveling the mystery of the FLE in the FTC will help unravel the mechanisms underpinning flash-lag and perhaps even perceptual localization in general. Our experiments show that eccentricity of the moving stimulus was a contributing factor, as were eccentricity of the flashed stimulus and spatial separation between the two stimuli. Other factors, such as contrast and offset of moving stimulus, also modulate the magnitude of the FLE in the FTC. We surmise that uncertainty in determining the position in space of a moving stimulus is a key requirement for the lag-effect. A lag-effect in the FTC challenges influential models, such as differential latency, motion extrapolation, and postdiction. Based partly on the notion of an asymmetric spread of activity that arises because of the sheer nature of motion and from a combination of established physiological mechanisms, we propose a schematic account of the present findings that subsumes previous psychological models and scaffolds past experimental findings. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15358076     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Spatial and temporal properties of the illusory motion-induced position shift for drifting stimuli.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Saumil S Patel; Harold E Bedell; Ozgur Yilmaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Perceptual compression of space through position integration.

Authors:  Barrie W Roulston; Matt W Self; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Christopher R L Cantor; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Faster processing of moving compared with flashed bars in awake macaque V1 provides a neural correlate of the flash lag illusion.

Authors:  Manivannan Subramaniyan; Alexander S Ecker; Saumil S Patel; R James Cotton; Matthias Bethge; Xaq Pitkow; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dynamic engagement of human motion detectors across space-time coordinates.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Temporal integration of focus position signal during compensation for pursuit in optic flow.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg; Albert van den Berg; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Dynamics of spatial distortions reveal multiple time scales of motion adaptation.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Characteristics of motor resonance predict the pattern of flash-lag effects for biological motion.

Authors:  Klaus Kessler; Lucy Gordon; Kari Cessford; Martin Lages
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.