Literature DB >> 16959642

Perceptual compression of space through position integration.

Barrie W Roulston1, Matt W Self, Semir Zeki.   

Abstract

The mechanism of positional localization has recently been debated due to interest in the flash-lag effect, which occurs when a briefly flashed stationary stimulus is perceived to lag behind a spatially aligned moving stimulus. Here we report positional localization observed at motion offsets as well as at onsets. In the 'flash-lead' effect, a moving object is perceived to be behind a spatially concurrent stationary flash before the two disappear. With 'reverse-repmo', subjects mis-localize the final position of a moving bar in the direction opposite to the trajectory of motion. Finally, we demonstrate that simultaneous onset and offset effects lead to a perceived compression of visual space. By characterizing illusory effects observed at motion offsets as well as at onsets, we provide evidence that the perceived position of a moving object is the result of an averaging process over a short time period, weighted towards the most recent positions. Our account explains a variety of motion illusions, including the compression of moving shapes when viewed through apertures.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16959642      PMCID: PMC1634908          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  21 in total

1.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness.

Authors:  D M Eagleman; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Vernier and contrast discrimination in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  D M Levi; P V McGraw; S A Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process.

Authors:  B Krekelberg; M Lappe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction.

Authors:  S S Patel; H Ogmen; H E Bedell; V Sampath
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-11-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation.

Authors:  D Whitney; I Murakami
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Motion-induced perceptual extrapolation of blurred visual targets.

Authors:  Y X Fu; Y Shen; Y Dan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Stereoillusion based on visual persistence.

Authors:  M Morgan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Motion deblurring in human vision.

Authors:  D C Burr; M J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system.

Authors:  D C Burr
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-03-11

10.  Motion extrapolation in catching.

Authors:  R Nijhawan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Temporal integration of focus position signal during compensation for pursuit in optic flow.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg; Albert van den Berg; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The Flash-Lag, Fröhlich and Related Motion Illusions Are Natural Consequences of Discrete Sampling in the Visual System.

Authors:  Keith A Schneider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-31

4.  Illusory Oscillation of the Central Rotation Axis.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakajima; Shohei Kakuda; Shunji Satoh
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-07-25

5.  Perceptual shrinkage of a one-way motion path with high-speed motion.

Authors:  Yutaka Nakajima; Yutaka Sakaguchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.