Literature DB >> 15338732

Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation.

Torsten Rohlfing1, Daniel B Russakoff, Calvin R Maurer.   

Abstract

It is well known in the pattern recognition community that the accuracy of classifications obtained by combining decisions made by independent classifiers can be substantially higher than the accuracy of the individual classifiers. We have previously shown this to be true for atlas-based segmentation of biomedical images. The conventional method for combining individual classifiers weights each classifier equally (vote or sum rule fusion). In this paper, we propose two methods that estimate the performances of the individual classifiers and combine the individual classifiers by weighting them according to their estimated performance. The two methods are multiclass extensions of an expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for ground truth estimation of binary classification based on decisions of multiple experts (Warfield et al., 2004). The first method performs parameter estimation independently for each class with a subsequent integration step. The second method considers all classes simultaneously. We demonstrate the efficacy of these performance-based fusion methods by applying them to atlas-based segmentations of three-dimensional confocal microscopy images of bee brains. In atlas-based image segmentation, multiple classifiers arise naturally by applying different registration methods to the same atlas, or the same registration method to different atlases, or both. We perform a validation study designed to quantify the success of classifier combination methods in atlas-based segmentation. By applying random deformations, a given ground truth atlas is transformed into multiple segmentations that could result from imperfect registrations of an image to multiple atlas images. In a second evaluation study, multiple actual atlas-based segmentations are combined and their accuracies computed by comparing them to a manual segmentation. We demonstrate in both evaluation studies that segmentations produced by combining multiple individual registration-based segmentations are more accurate for the two classifier fusion methods we propose, which weight the individual classifiers according to their EM-based performance estimates, than for simple sum rule fusion, which weights each classifier equally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15338732     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2004.830803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  89 in total

1.  Evaluation of multiple-atlas-based strategies for segmentation of the thyroid gland in head and neck CT images for IMRT.

Authors:  A Chen; K J Niermann; M A Deeley; B M Dawant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Learning likelihoods for labeling (L3): a general multi-classifier segmentation algorithm.

Authors:  Neil I Weisenfeld; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

3.  Nonparametric Mixture Models for Supervised Image Parcellation.

Authors:  Mert R Sabuncu; B T Thomas Yeo; Koen Van Leemput; Bruce Fischl; Polina Golland
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2009-09-01

4.  Learning task-optimal registration cost functions for localizing cytoarchitecture and function in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  B T Thomas Yeo; Mert R Sabuncu; Tom Vercauteren; Daphne J Holt; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Polina Golland; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Statistical Fusion of Surface Labels Provided by Multiple Raters.

Authors:  John A Bogovic; Bennett A Landman; Pierre-Louis Bazin; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-03-01

6.  Foibles, follies, and fusion: web-based collaboration for medical image labeling.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Andrew J Asman; Andrew G Scoggins; John A Bogovic; Joshua A Stein; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Harmonizing DTI measurements across scanners to examine the development of white matter microstructure in 803 adolescents of the NCANDA study.

Authors:  Kilian M Pohl; Edith V Sullivan; Torsten Rohlfing; Weiwei Chu; Dongjin Kwon; B Nolan Nichols; Yong Zhang; Sandra A Brown; Susan F Tapert; Kevin Cummins; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker; Devin Prouty; Michael D De Bellis; James T Voyvodic; Duncan B Clark; Claudiu Schirda; Bonnie J Nagel; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Robust Optic Nerve Segmentation on Clinically Acquired CT.

Authors:  Swetasudha Panda; Andrew J Asman; Michael P Delisi; Louise A Mawn; Robert L Galloway; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

9.  Statistical label fusion with hierarchical performance models.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Alexander S Dagley; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

10.  Groupwise multi-atlas segmentation of the spinal cord's internal structure.

Authors:  Andrew J Asman; Frederick W Bryan; Seth A Smith; Daniel S Reich; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.