Literature DB >> 24817810

Robust Optic Nerve Segmentation on Clinically Acquired CT.

Swetasudha Panda1, Andrew J Asman2, Michael P Delisi3, Louise A Mawn3, Robert L Galloway2, Bennett A Landman4.   

Abstract

The optic nerve is a sensitive central nervous system structure, which plays a critical role in many devastating pathological conditions. Several methods have been proposed in recent years to segment the optic nerve automatically, but progress toward full automation has been limited. Multi-atlas methods have been successful for brain segmentation, but their application to smaller anatomies remains relatively unexplored. Herein we evaluate a framework for robust and fully automated segmentation of the optic nerves, eye globes and muscles. We employ a robust registration procedure for accurate registrations, variable voxel resolution and image field-of-view. We demonstrate the efficacy of an optimal combination of SyN registration and a recently proposed label fusion algorithm (Non-local Spatial STAPLE) that accounts for small-scale errors in registration correspondence. On a dataset containing 30 highly varying computed tomography (CT) images of the human brain, the optimal registration and label fusion pipeline resulted in a median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.77, symmetric mean surface distance error of 0.55 mm, symmetric Hausdorff distance error of 3.33 mm for the optic nerves. Simultaneously, we demonstrate the robustness of the optimal algorithm by segmenting the optic nerve structure in 316 CT scans obtained from 182 subjects from a thyroid eye disease (TED) patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed Tomography; Multi-Atlas; Optic Nerve; Segmentation; Statistical Label Fusion

Year:  2014        PMID: 24817810      PMCID: PMC4013110          DOI: 10.1117/12.2043715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  18 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Performance-based classifier combination in atlas-based image segmentation using expectation-maximization parameter estimation.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Daniel B Russakoff; Calvin R Maurer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Evaluation of an atlas-based automatic segmentation software for the delineation of brain organs at risk in a radiation therapy clinical context.

Authors:  Aurélie Isambert; Frédéric Dhermain; François Bidault; Olivier Commowick; Pierre-Yves Bondiau; Grégoire Malandain; Dimitri Lefkopoulos
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Eigenfaces for recognition.

Authors:  M Turk; A Pentland
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation.

Authors:  Hongzhi Wang; Sandhitsu R Das; Jung Wook Suh; Murat Altinay; John Pluta; Caryne Craige; Brian Avants; Paul A Yushkevich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A fully automatic multimodality image registration algorithm.

Authors:  B A Ardekani; M Braun; B F Hutton; I Kanno; H Iida
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Fast and robust multi-atlas segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jyrki Mp Lötjönen; Robin Wolz; Juha R Koikkalainen; Lennart Thurfjell; Gunhild Waldemar; Hilkka Soininen; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain.

Authors:  B B Avants; C L Epstein; M Grossman; J C Gee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Efficient orbital structures segmentation with prior anatomical knowledge.

Authors:  Nava Aghdasi; Yangming Li; Angelique Berens; Richard A Harbison; Kris S Moe; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-22

2.  Simultaneous total intracranial volume and posterior fossa volume estimation using multi-atlas label fusion.

Authors:  Yuankai Huo; Andrew J Asman; Andrew J Plassard; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Disambiguating the optic nerve from the surrounding cerebrospinal fluid: Application to MS-related atrophy.

Authors:  Robert L Harrigan; Andrew J Plassard; Frederick W Bryan; Gabriela Caires; Louise A Mawn; Lindsey M Dethrage; Siddharama Pawate; Robert L Galloway; Seth A Smith; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.668

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.