Literature DB >> 1532819

Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.

R M Nosofsky1, J K Kruschke, S C McKinley.   

Abstract

Adaptive network and exemplar-similarity models were compared on their ability to predict category learning and transfer data. An exemplar-based network (Kruschke, 1990a, 1990b, 1992) that combines key aspects of both modeling approaches was also tested. The exemplar-based network incorporates an exemplar-based category representation in which exemplars become associated to categories through the same error-driven, interactive learning rules that are assumed in standard adaptive networks. Experiment 1, which partially replicated and extended the probabilistic classification learning paradigm of Gluck and Bower (1988a), demonstrated the importance of an error-driven learning rule. Experiment 2, which extended the classification learning paradigm of Medin and Schaffer (1978) that discriminated between exemplar and prototype models, demonstrated the importance of an exemplar-based category representation. Only the exemplar-based network accounted for all the major qualitative phenomena; it also achieved good quantitative predictions of the learning and transfer data in both experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1532819     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.2.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  23 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; L A Alfonso-Reese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Exemplar-based accounts of "multiple-system" phenomena in perceptual categorization.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; M K Johansen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  An inverse base rate effect with continuously valued stimuli.

Authors:  M L Kalish
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-06

4.  Base rates versus sample accuracy: competition for control in human matching to sample.

Authors:  A S Goodie; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.

Authors:  T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

6.  Measures of similarity in models of categorization.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Eef Ameel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

7.  As easy to memorize as they are to classify: the 5-4 categories and the category advantage.

Authors:  Mark Blair; Don Homa
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

8.  Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.

Authors:  Joël Bradmetz; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-11-09

9.  The divergent autoencoder (DIVA) model of category learning.

Authors:  Kenneth J Kutrz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

10.  What do second language listeners know about spoken words? Effects of experience and attention in spoken word processing.

Authors:  Pavel Trofimovich
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.