Literature DB >> 17093950

Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.

Joël Bradmetz1, Fabien Mathy.   

Abstract

This paper reports a study of a multi-agent model of working memory (WM) in the context of Boolean concept learning. The model aims to assess the compressibility of information processed in WM. Concept complexity is described as a function of communication resources (i.e., the number of agents and the structure of communication between agents) required in WM to learn a target concept. This model has been successfully applied in measuring learning times for three-dimensional (3D) concepts (Mathy and Bradmetz in Curr Psychol Cognit 22(1):41-82, 2004). In this previous study, learning time was found to be a function of compression time. To assess the effect of decompression time, this paper presents an extended intra-conceptual study of response times for two- and 3D concepts. Response times are measured in recognition phases. The model explains why the time required to compress a sample of examples into a rule is directly linked to the time to decompress this rule when categorizing examples. Three experiments were conducted with 65, 49, and 84 undergraduate students who were given Boolean concept learning tasks in two and three dimensions (also called rule-based classification tasks). The results corroborate the metric of decompression given by the multi-agent model, especially when the model is parameterized following static serial processing of information. Also, this static serial model better fits the patterns of response times than an exemplar-based model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17093950     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0098-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  26 in total

1.  An Introduction to Model Selection.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization.

Authors:  K Lamberts
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; L A Alfonso-Reese
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

4.  Learning nonlinearly separable categories by inference and classification.

Authors:  Takashi Yamauchi; Bradley C Love; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science?

Authors:  Nick Chater; Paul Vitányi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning.

Authors:  J K Kruschke
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Levine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03

10.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  8 in total

1.  A rule-based presentation order facilitates category learning.

Authors:  Fabien Mathy; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

2.  Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization.

Authors:  Daniel R Little; Robert M Nosofsky; Stephen E Denton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Chunk formation in immediate memory and how it relates to data compression.

Authors:  Mustapha Chekaf; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-06-29

4.  Benefits and pitfalls of data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Laura Lazartigues; Frédéric Lavigne; Carlos Aguilar; Nelson Cowan; Fabien Mathy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  The simplicity principle in perception and cognition.

Authors:  Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-07-29

6.  "Memory compression" effects in visual working memory are contingent on explicit long-term memory.

Authors:  William X Q Ngiam; James A Brissenden; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-08

7.  The language of geometry: Fast comprehension of geometrical primitives and rules in human adults and preschoolers.

Authors:  Marie Amalric; Liping Wang; Pierre Pica; Santiago Figueira; Mariano Sigman; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Chunking and redintegration in verbal short-term memory.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; Kristjan Kalm; Jane Hall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.051

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.