Literature DB >> 15058690

As easy to memorize as they are to classify: the 5-4 categories and the category advantage.

Mark Blair1, Don Homa.   

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that some categories commonly used in category learning research are eliciting primarily item-level memorization strategies. A new measure of generalization, the category advantage, was introduced and used to test performance on the popular "5-4" categories. To estimate a category advantage, performance on a standard category learning task is compared with performance in an identification task, where participants learn a unique response to each stimulus. Once corrected for differences in chance expectancy, the advantage shown for the category learning task represents the degree to which participants capitalize on the natural similarity structure of the categories. In Experiment 1, the category advantage measure was validated on structured and unstructured categories. In Experiments 2 and 3, the 5-4 categories failed to produce a category advantage when tested with either of two stimulus types, suggesting that these categories elicit predominantly memorization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15058690     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization.

Authors:  K Lamberts
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model.

Authors:  J D Smith; J P Minda
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Are there representational shifts during category learning?

Authors:  Mark K Johansen; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Combining exemplar-based category representations and connectionist learning rules.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; J K Kruschke; S C McKinley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.

Authors:  John Paul Minda; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification.

Authors:  D L Medin; M W Altom; T D Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Category vs. item learning: implications for categorization models.

Authors:  S K Reed
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1978-11

9.  Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Authors:  M A Erickson; J K Kruschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-06

10.  The learning of categories: parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  22 in total

1.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

2.  Strategy shifts in classification skill acquisition: does memory retrieval dominate rule use?

Authors:  Lyle E Bourne; Alice F Healy; James A Kole; Susan M Graham
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

3.  When parameters collide: a warning about categorization models.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  Revisiting the linear separability constraint: New implications for theories of human category learning.

Authors:  Kimery R Levering; Nolan Conaway; Kenneth J Kurtz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-04

5.  Perceptual Learning of Intonation Contour Categories in Adults and 9- to 11-Year-Old Children: Adults Are More Narrow-Minded.

Authors:  Vsevolod Kapatsinski; Paul Olejarczuk; Melissa A Redford
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-02-22

6.  Idealness and similarity in goal-derived categories: a computational examination.

Authors:  Wouter Voorspoels; Gert Storms; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

7.  Training set coherence and set size effects on concept generalization and recognition.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Perceptual classification in a rapidly changing environment.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Timothy E Behrens; Etienne Koechlin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Stages of category learning in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  J David Smith; William P Chapman; Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

Review 10.  Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization.

Authors:  J David Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.