Literature DB >> 15327961

Local propensities and statistical potentials of backbone dihedral angles in proteins.

Marcos R Betancourt1, Jeffrey Skolnick.   

Abstract

The following three issues concerning the backbone dihedral angles of protein structures are presented. (1) How do the dihedral angles of the 20 amino acids depend on the identity and conformation of their nearest residues? (2) To what extent are the native dihedral angles determined by local (dihedral) potentials? (3) How to build a knowledge-based potential for a residue's dihedral angles, considering the identity and conformation of its nearest residues? We find that the dihedral angle distribution for a residue can significantly depend on the identity and conformation of its adjacent residues. These correlations are in sharp contrast to the Flory isolated-pair hypothesis. Statistical potentials are built for all combinations of residue triplets and depend on the dihedral angles between consecutive residues. First, a low-resolution potential is obtained, which only differentiates between the main populated basins in the dihedral angle density plots. Minimization of the dihedral potential for 125 test proteins reveals that most native alpha-helical residues (89%) and a large fraction of native beta-sheet residues (47%) adopt conformations close to their native one. For native loop residues, the percentage is 48%. It is also found that this fraction is higher for residues away from the ends of alpha or beta secondary structure elements. In addition, a higher resolution potential is built as a function of dihedral angles by a smoothing procedure and continuous functions interpolations. Monte Carlo energy minimization with this potential results in a lower fraction for native beta-sheet residues. Nevertheless, because of the higher flexibility and entropy of beta structures, they could be preferred under the influence of non-local interactions. In general, most alpha-helices and many beta-sheets are strongly determined by the local potential, while the conformations in loops and near the end of beta-sheets are more influenced by non-local interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15327961     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.06.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  23 in total

1.  Dihedral-angle information entropy as a gauge of secondary structure propensity.

Authors:  Shi Zhong; Jeremy M Moix; Stephen Quirk; Rigoberto Hernandez
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures.

Authors:  Min-Yi Shen; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  ProRegIn: a regularity index for the selection of native-like tertiary structures of proteins.

Authors:  Lipi Thukral; Sandhya R Shenoy; Kumkum Bhushan; B Jayaram
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Authors:  Guang Qiang Dong; Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Ben Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Distribution of dipeptides in different protein structural classes: an effort to find new similarities.

Authors:  Mahin Ghadimi; Emran Heshmati; Khosrow Khalifeh
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Statistical potential for modeling and ranking of protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; John J Irwin; Guangqiang Dong; Brian K Shoichet; Andrej Sali
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Effective knowledge-based potentials.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Francisco Melo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Automated real-space refinement of protein structures using a realistic backbone move set.

Authors:  Esmael J Haddadian; Haipeng Gong; Abhishek K Jha; Xiaojing Yang; Joe Debartolo; James R Hinshaw; Phoebe A Rice; Tobin R Sosnick; Karl F Freed
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of 441 Two-Residue Peptides in Aqueous Solution: Conformational Preferences and Neighboring Residue Effects with the Amber ff99SB-ildn-NMR Force Field.

Authors:  Shuxiang Li; Casey T Andrews; Tamara Frembgen-Kesner; Mark S Miller; Stephen L Siemonsma; Timothy D Collingsworth; Isaac T Rockafellow; Nguyet Anh Ngo; Brady A Campbell; Reid F Brown; Chengxuan Guo; Michael Schrodt; Yu-Tsan Liu; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Grid-based backbone correction to the ff12SB protein force field for implicit-solvent simulations.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Justin L MacCallum; Emiliano Brini; Carlos Simmerling; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.