Literature DB >> 24078704

Optimized atomic statistical potentials: assessment of protein interfaces and loops.

Guang Qiang Dong1, Hao Fan, Dina Schneidman-Duhovny, Ben Webb, Andrej Sali.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Statistical potentials have been widely used for modeling whole proteins and their parts (e.g. sidechains and loops) as well as interactions between proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Here, we formulate the statistical potentials entirely within a statistical framework, avoiding questionable statistical mechanical assumptions and approximations, including a definition of the reference state.
RESULTS: We derive a general Bayesian framework for inferring statistically optimized atomic potentials (SOAP) in which the reference state is replaced with data-driven 'recovery' functions. Moreover, we restrain the relative orientation between two covalent bonds instead of a simple distance between two atoms, in an effort to capture orientation-dependent interactions such as hydrogen bonds. To demonstrate this general approach, we computed statistical potentials for protein-protein docking (SOAP-PP) and loop modeling (SOAP-Loop). For docking, a near-native model is within the top 10 scoring models in 40% of the PatchDock benchmark cases, compared with 23 and 27% for the state-of-the-art ZDOCK and FireDock scoring functions, respectively. Similarly, for modeling 12-residue loops in the PLOP benchmark, the average main-chain root mean square deviation of the best scored conformations by SOAP-Loop is 1.5 Å, close to the average root mean square deviation of the best sampled conformations (1.2 Å) and significantly better than that selected by Rosetta (2.1 Å), DFIRE (2.3 Å), DOPE (2.5 Å) and PLOP scoring functions (3.0 Å). Our Bayesian framework may also result in more accurate statistical potentials for additional modeling applications, thus affording better leverage of the experimentally determined protein structures.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SOAP-PP and SOAP-Loop are available as part of MODELLER (http://salilab.org/modeller).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078704      PMCID: PMC3842762          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  76 in total

Review 1.  Computational prediction of DNA-protein interactions: a review.

Authors:  Xue-Mei Ding; Xiao-Yong Pan; Chen Xu; Hong-Bin Shen
Journal:  Curr Comput Aided Drug Des       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.606

2.  Crystal contacts as nature's docking solutions.

Authors:  Evgeny Krissinel
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Backbone statistical potential from local sequence-structure interactions in protein loops.

Authors:  Ionel A Rata; Yaohang Li; Eric Jakobsson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Challenges for the prediction of macromolecular interactions.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Alessia David; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions.

Authors:  Maxim V Shapovalov; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  Performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in CAPRI rounds 13-19.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Thom Vreven; Brian G Pierce; Jui-Hung Hung; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-11-15

7.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  New statistical potential for quality assessment of protein models and a survey of energy functions.

Authors:  Dmitry Rykunov; Andras Fiser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A novel side-chain orientation dependent potential derived from random-walk reference state for protein fold selection and structure prediction.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A series of PDB related databases for everyday needs.

Authors:  Robbie P Joosten; Tim A H te Beek; Elmar Krieger; Maarten L Hekkelman; Rob W W Hooft; Reinhard Schneider; Chris Sander; Gert Vriend
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  52 in total

1.  Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller.

Authors:  Ben Webb; Andrej Sali; Narayanan Eswar; Marc A Marti-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; David Eramian; Min-Yi Shen; Ursula Pieper
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10

2.  Comparative Protein Structure Modeling Using MODELLER.

Authors:  Benjamin Webb; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-06-20

3.  Disentangling the molecular determinants for Cenp-F localization to nuclear pores and kinetochores.

Authors:  Alessandro Berto; Jinchao Yu; Stéphanie Morchoisne-Bolhy; Chiara Bertipaglia; Richard Vallee; Julien Dumont; Francoise Ochsenbein; Raphael Guerois; Valérie Doye
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  SSEThread: Integrative threading of the DNA-PKcs sequence based on data from chemical cross-linking and hydrogen deuterium exchange.

Authors:  Daniel J Saltzberg; Morgan Hepburn; Kala Bharath Pilla; David C Schriemer; Susan P Lees-Miller; Tom L Blundell; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  FoXS, FoXSDock and MultiFoXS: Single-state and multi-state structural modeling of proteins and their complexes based on SAXS profiles.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Michal Hammel; John A Tainer; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Prion Protein-Antibody Complexes Characterized by Chromatography-Coupled Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering.

Authors:  Lester Carter; Seung Joong Kim; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Jan Stöhr; Guillaume Poncet-Montange; Thomas M Weiss; Hiro Tsuruta; Stanley B Prusiner; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Human and server docking prediction for CAPRI round 30-35 using LZerD with combined scoring functions.

Authors:  Lenna X Peterson; Hyungrae Kim; Juan Esquivel-Rodriguez; Amitava Roy; Xusi Han; Woong-Hee Shin; Jian Zhang; Genki Terashi; Matt Lee; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-14

Review 8.  Uncertainty in integrative structural modeling.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Riccardo Pellarin; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.809

9.  Modeling Structure and Dynamics of Protein Complexes with SAXS Profiles.

Authors:  Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Michal Hammel
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

10.  Integrative proteomics identifies thousands of distinct, multi-epitope, and high-affinity nanobodies.

Authors:  Yufei Xiang; Zhe Sang; Lirane Bitton; Jianquan Xu; Yang Liu; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Yi Shi
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 10.304

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.