Literature DB >> 26579777

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of 441 Two-Residue Peptides in Aqueous Solution: Conformational Preferences and Neighboring Residue Effects with the Amber ff99SB-ildn-NMR Force Field.

Shuxiang Li1, Casey T Andrews1, Tamara Frembgen-Kesner1, Mark S Miller1, Stephen L Siemonsma1, Timothy D Collingsworth1, Isaac T Rockafellow1, Nguyet Anh Ngo1, Brady A Campbell1, Reid F Brown1, Chengxuan Guo1, Michael Schrodt1, Yu-Tsan Liu1, Adrian H Elcock1.   

Abstract

Understanding the intrinsic conformational preferences of amino acids and the extent to which they are modulated by neighboring residues is a key issue for developing predictive models of protein folding and stability. Here we present the results of 441 independent explicit-solvent MD simulations of all possible two-residue peptides that contain the 20 standard amino acids with histidine modeled in both its neutral and protonated states. (3)J(HNHα) coupling constants and δ(Hα) chemical shifts calculated from the MD simulations correlate quite well with recently published experimental measurements for a corresponding set of two-residue peptides. Neighboring residue effects (NREs) on the average (3)J(HNHα) and δ(Hα) values of adjacent residues are also reasonably well reproduced, with the large NREs exerted experimentally by aromatic residues, in particular, being accurately captured. NREs on the secondary structure preferences of adjacent amino acids have been computed and compared with corresponding effects observed in a coil library and the average β-turn preferences of all amino acid types have been determined. Finally, the intrinsic conformational preferences of histidine, and its NREs on the conformational preferences of adjacent residues, are both shown to be strongly affected by the protonation state of the imidazole ring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26579777      PMCID: PMC4656151          DOI: 10.1021/ct5010966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  63 in total

Review 1.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

2.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Self-consistent 3J coupling analysis for the joint calibration of Karplus coefficients and evaluation of torsion angles.

Authors:  J M Schmidt; M Blümel; F Löhr; H Rüterjans
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free-energy method.

Authors:  Alessandro Barducci; Giovanni Bussi; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Modulation of intrinsic phi,psi propensities of amino acids by neighbouring residues in the coil regions of protein structures: NMR analysis and dissection of a beta-hairpin peptide.

Authors:  S R Griffiths-Jones; G J Sharman; A J Maynard; M S Searle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-12-18       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Intrinsic backbone preferences are fully present in blocked amino acids.

Authors:  Franc Avbelj; Simona Golic Grdadolnik; Joze Grdadolnik; Robert L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure and dynamics of the homologous series of alanine peptides: a joint molecular dynamics/NMR study.

Authors:  Jürgen Graf; Phuong H Nguyen; Gerhard Stock; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Intrinsic propensities of amino acid residues in GxG peptides inferred from amide I' band profiles and NMR scalar coupling constants.

Authors:  Andrew Hagarman; Thomas J Measey; Daniel Mathieu; Harald Schwalbe; Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

Review 10.  Local order in the unfolded state: conformational biases and nearest neighbor interactions.

Authors:  Siobhan Toal; Reinhard Schweitzer-Stenner
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2014-07-24
View more
  5 in total

1.  Osmotic Pressure Simulations of Amino Acids and Peptides Highlight Potential Routes to Protein Force Field Parameterization.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Wesley K Lay; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Stacking Free Energies of All DNA and RNA Nucleoside Pairs and Dinucleoside-Monophosphates Computed Using Recently Revised AMBER Parameters and Compared with Experiment.

Authors:  Reid F Brown; Casey T Andrews; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Parametrization of Backbone Flexibility in a Coarse-Grained Force Field for Proteins (COFFDROP) Derived from All-Atom Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations of All Possible Two-Residue Peptides.

Authors:  Tamara Frembgen-Kesner; Casey T Andrews; Shuxiang Li; Nguyet Anh Ngo; Scott A Shubert; Aakash Jain; Oluwatoni J Olayiwola; Mitch R Weishaar; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Residue-Specific Force Field (RSFF2) Improves the Modeling of Conformational Behavior of Peptides and Proteins.

Authors:  Shuxiang Li; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.475

5.  RNA force field with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art protein force fields.

Authors:  Dazhi Tan; Stefano Piana; Robert M Dirks; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.