Literature DB >> 26574266

Grid-based backbone correction to the ff12SB protein force field for implicit-solvent simulations.

Alberto Perez, Justin L MacCallum1, Emiliano Brini, Carlos Simmerling, Ken A Dill.   

Abstract

Force fields, such as Amber's ff12SB, can be fairly accurate models of the physical forces in proteins and other biomolecules. When coupled with accurate solvation models, force fields are able to bring insight into the conformational preferences, transitions, pathways, and free energies for these biomolecules. When computational speed/cost matters, implicit solvent is often used but at the cost of accuracy. We present an empirical grid-like correction term, in the spirit of cMAPs, to the combination of the ff12SB protein force field and the GBneck2 implicit-solvent model. Ff12SB-cMAP is parametrized on experimental helicity data. We provide validation on a set of peptides and proteins. Ff12SB-cMAP successfully improves the secondary structure biases observed in ff12SB + Gbneck2. Ff12SB-cMAP can be downloaded ( https://github.com/laufercenter/Amap.git ) and used within the Amber package. It can improve the agreement of force fields + implicit solvent with experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26574266      PMCID: PMC4813323          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  52 in total

1.  How fast-folding proteins fold.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Helicity of short E-R/K peptides.

Authors:  Ruth F Sommese; Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan; Robert L Baldwin; James A Spudich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald.

Authors:  Romelia Salomon-Ferrer; Andreas W Götz; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

Review 5.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  A test on peptide stability of AMBER force fields with implicit solvation.

Authors:  M Scott Shell; Ryan Ritterson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Determining protein structures by combining semireliable data with atomistic physical models by Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Perez; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  New force field on modeling intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Wei Ye; Cheng Jiang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  Chem Biol Drug Des       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.817

9.  Context-independent, temperature-dependent helical propensities for amino acid residues.

Authors:  Robert J Moreau; Christian R Schubert; Khaled A Nasr; Marianna Török; Justin S Miller; Robert J Kennedy; Daniel S Kemp
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Comparison of Secondary Structure Formation Using 10 Different Force Fields in Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Elio A Cino; Wing-Yiu Choy; Mikko Karttunen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  21 in total

1.  Accelerating physical simulations of proteins by leveraging external knowledge.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 2.  Force field development phase II: Relaxation of physics-based criteria… or inclusion of more rigorous physics into the representation of molecular energetics.

Authors:  A T Hagler
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Source of oseltamivir resistance due to single E119D and double E119D/H274Y mutations in pdm09H1N1 influenza neuraminidase.

Authors:  Chonnikan Hanpaibool; Matina Leelawiwat; Kaito Takahashi; Thanyada Rungrotmongkol
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Label-free sensing of the binding state of MUC1 peptide and anti-MUC1 aptamer solution in fluidic chip by terahertz spectroscopy.

Authors:  Xiang Zhao; Mingkun Zhang; Dongshan Wei; Yunxia Wang; Shihan Yan; Mengwan Liu; Xiang Yang; Ke Yang; Hong-Liang Cui; Weiling Fu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  The emergence of sequence-dependent structural motifs in stretched, torsionally constrained DNA.

Authors:  Jack W Shepherd; Robert J Greenall; Matt I J Probert; Agnes Noy; Mark C Leake
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The human platelet antigen-1b (Pro33) variant of αIIbβ3 allosterically shifts the dynamic conformational equilibrium of this integrin toward the active state.

Authors:  Giulia Pagani; Joana P V Pereira; Volker R Stoldt; Andreas Beck; Rüdiger E Scharf; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA in Complex 3D Arrangements for Comparison with Lower Resolution Structural Experiments.

Authors:  George Watson; Victor Velasco-Berrelleza; Agnes Noy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  CHARMM-GUI Implicit Solvent Modeler for Various Generalized Born Models in Different Simulation Programs.

Authors:  Kye Won Wang; Jumin Lee; Han Zhang; Donghyuk Suh; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Advances in free-energy-based simulations of protein folding and ligand binding.

Authors:  Alberto Perez; Joseph A Morrone; Carlos Simmerling; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Best Practices for Foundations in Molecular Simulations [Article v1.0].

Authors:  Efrem Braun; Justin Gilmer; Heather B Mayes; David L Mobley; Jacob I Monroe; Samarjeet Prasad; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  Living J Comput Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.