| Literature DB >> 15298706 |
Christopher A Bidwell1, Lauren N Kramer, Allison C Perkins, Tracy S Hadfield, Diane E Moody, Noelle E Cockett.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The callipyge mutation is located within an imprinted gene cluster on ovine chromosome 18. The callipyge trait exhibits polar overdominant inheritance due to the fact that only heterozygotes inheriting a mutant paternal allele (paternal heterozygotes) have a phenotype of muscle hypertrophy, reduced fat and a more compact skeleton. The mutation is a single A to G transition in an intergenic region that results in the increased expression of several genes within the imprinted cluster without changing their parent-of-origin allele-specific expression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15298706 PMCID: PMC514575 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
Figure 1The callipyge region of ovine chromosome 18. A diagram of the callipyge region [3] based on GenBank accession No. AF345168 is shown. Six known transcripts are indicated along with the direction of transcription (arrows). Transcripts expressed from the paternal allele are shown as orange arrows and those expressed from the maternal allele are shown as black arrows [3]. A blue line indicates the position of the causative mutation. Alleles with an A are wild type (+) and the mutant callipyge allele (CLPG) has a G at this position [23, 24].
Figure 2Northern blot analysis of skeletal muscle RNA from 12-week-old lambs. Expression of five genes from the callipyge region is shown for the four possible genotypes in 12-week-old lambs. Each lane contains total RNA from an individual animal. The genotypes are given with the maternal allele first followed by the paternal allele. The callipyge allele (CLPG) has been abbreviated to C and the paternal heterozygote that has the callipyge phenotype is indicated with an asterisk (*). Strand specific probes are indicated on the left and transcript sizes are indicated on the right. The skeletal muscles shown are the longissimus dorsi (LD), semimembranosus (SM), gluteus medius (GM) and the supraspinatus (SP). The blots were hybridized with an 18S RNA probe to show the equivalence of RNA loading and transfer.
Figure 3Mapping of A) A diagram of the PEG11 open reading frame (black arrow) and the position of the five riboprobes are shown. The PEG11 open reading frame extends from base 191859 to 187858 on the complementary strand of AF354168. B) Ribonuclease protection assays using PEG11AS (left column) and PEG11 (right column) are shown using total RNA from the gluteus medius (GM) and the supraspinatus (SP) muscles for each of the four possible genotypes. The genotypes are given with the maternal allele first followed by the paternal allele. The CLPG allele has been abbreviated to C and the paternal heterozygote that demonstrates the callipyge phenotype is indicated with an asterisk (*). Yeast RNA with RNase treatment (Y+) and without RNase treatment (Y-) are shown as controls. A black arrow indicates the RNA fragments protected by each of the five RNA probes. Some full-length probes for C and E that could not be completely eliminated by RNase digestion are present in both muscle RNA samples and the yeast RNA control (Y+).
Figure 4Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis of transcript abundance in the gluteus medius and supraspinatus muscles. Least square means and standard errors for transcript abundance by genotype are shown for the gluteus medius (GM), and supraspinatus (SP). The genotypes are given with the maternal allele first followed by the paternal allele and the CLPG allele has been abbreviated to C. Quantification of DLK1 and MEG8 transcripts (A, C) was based on random primed cDNA synthesis using 213 ng of total RNA. Quantification of PEG11 and PEG11AS (B, D) transcripts was based on gene-specific priming of cDNA synthesis using 400 ng of total RNA. Different superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) between genotypic means for a given mRNA transcript and muscle. Numerical values for the log starting abundance are given for each mRNA transcript in a table below the genotypes.
Statistical analysis of gene expression by quantitative PCR
| Orthogonal Contrast P-Values | |||||
| Muscle | Gene | Effect of Genotype | Additive | Maternal Dominance | Paternal Polar |
| GM | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0261 | 0.0001 | |
| 0.0005 | 0.0009 | 0.4083 | 0.0047 | ||
| 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | ||
| 0.2622 | |||||
| 0.1393 | |||||
| SP | 0.1865 | ||||
| 0.0325 | 0.1398 | 0.9665 | 0.0094 | ||
| 0.0001 | 0.0179 | 0.3315 | 0.0001 | ||
| 0.1438 | |||||
| 0.3626 | |||||
Primer sequences for ribonuclease protection assay probes and quantitative PCR
| Sizea | Tm | Locationb | |||
| Primer | Sequence | bp | °C | ||
| PEG11/PEG11AS | |||||
| C | F | AGGAACACCGCTGTGGAGGTAGAA | 135 | 59 | 4337 |
| R | ACAGCAGAGGCAGCCAAGCA | ||||
| E | F | GGTGACGCCCGTCTGCAAGT | 180 | 61 | 2427 |
| R | GTGGAACGGTTCGCCGACAT | ||||
| Pc | F | ACAGCTCAACAGTGGAGGTCATG | 199 | 55 | 996 |
| R | ATCAGCTGGCAGAGCACGATGAAC | ||||
| F | F | TTCCCCCATGGCTGTGAGAAAT | 175 | 58 | -390 |
| R | CCTCTGTGACCTTCTGGTGACCAA | ||||
| G | F | AGGCTGAATTGACAGAGATGT | 124 | 49 | -1193 |
| R | GTTAAATGGCTCAAGAACGA | ||||
| F | CCCGTCCTCTTGCTCCTGCT | 116 | 58 | ||
| R | GGCTGGCACCTGCACACACT | ||||
| F | CCCAGGGAGTGTGAGGCTCTTCT | 100 | 56 | ||
| R | GGACCCACGGCTGACCTGTT | ||||
| F | TGAGTGTCGCTGTTGAAGT | 150 | 58 | ||
| R | CCTGCCAAGTATGATGAGAT | ||||
aSize of the PCR product and protected fragment for RPA bLocation for the PCR product is relative to the first base of the PEG11 open reading frame. cCharlier et al. [3]
Statistical methods for genetic models
| Orthogonal Contrast Values by Genotype | ||||
| Genetic Model | +/+ | + | ||
| Additive | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Dominance | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 |
| Reciprocal Heterozygote | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0 |
| Maternal Dominance | -1 | 2 | 0 | -1 |
| Paternal Polar Overdominance | -1 | -1 | 3 | -1 |
| Number of Animals | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 |