Literature DB >> 15281392

Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: does unit price help?

Catherine E Sumpter1, William Temple, T Mary Foster.   

Abstract

Six hens pecked a key (Experiment 1) or pushed a door (Experiment 2) to obtain food reinforcement. In both experiments and as an analogue of price changes, the response requirements were varied in two ways: by increasing the number of responses required and by increasing the required force of each response. The two price manipulations (response number and response force) had different effects on behavior and produced different-shaped demand functions when the rates of consumption were plotted logarithmically against the price analogues. Irrespective of response topography, when the number of required responses was varied, the data paths appeared linear, with slopes close to -1.0. When the required force of each keypeck and doorpush was varied, the data paths were clearly curved, with increasingly steep downward slopes as the force increased. Using the concept of unit price did not fully remove the different effects of the two price manipulations. Those differences are best attributed to the differing times needed in order to complete each response unit under those price manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15281392     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  13 in total

1.  Effort- and time-cost effects on demand curves for food by pigeons under short session closed economies.

Authors:  S Tsunematsu
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Predicting and scaling hens' preferences for topographically different responses.

Authors:  C E Sumpter; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of differing response types and price manipulations on demand measures.

Authors:  C Sumpter; W Temple; T Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

Authors:  S R Hursh; T G Raslear; D Shurtleff; R Bauman; L Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Unit-price analysis of opioid consumption by monkeys responding under a progressive-ratio schedule of drug injection.

Authors:  J A English; J K Rowlett; W L Woolverton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers.

Authors:  S R Hursh; G Winger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats.

Authors:  K Alling; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  An economic analysis of "demand" for food in baboons.

Authors:  R W Foltin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral economic demand as a unifying language for addiction science: Promoting collaboration and integration of animal and human models.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Ryan T Lacy
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Characterizing the relationship between increases in the cost of nicotine and decreases in nicotine content in adult male rats: implications for tobacco regulation.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Laura E Rupprecht; Alan F Sved; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.