Literature DB >> 7751836

The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats.

K Alling1, A Poling.   

Abstract

Rats were exposed to two-component multiple schedules of food delivery. In the first experiment, 15 responses were required to produce food in both components. A downward force of 0.25 N (25 g) was always required to operate the response lever in one component. In the other, the required force was 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, or 2.00 N (25, 50, 100, or 200 g). In the second experiment, 0.25 N of force operated the lever in one component, but in the other, the force requirement for five consecutive responses at the beginning, middle, or end of each ratio was increased from 0.25 to 2.00 N. In the third experiment, the number of responses required to produce food was reduced from 15 to 5, and then to 1. Again, the effects of altering response force from 0.25 to 2.00 N were examined. In general, as response force increased in all experiments, mean response rates decreased and mean interresponse times increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751836      PMCID: PMC1334449          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  31 in total

1.  AN AVERSIVE STIMULUS AS A CORRELATED BLOCK COUNTER IN FR PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sequential effects of punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1960-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Force emission during bar pressing.

Authors:  J M NOTTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

4.  Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-04

5.  The effects of number of responses on pause length with temporal variables controlled.

Authors:  E K Crossman; R S Heaps; D L Nunes; L A Alferink
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Punishment contras during free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; M A Griffin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reductions in shock frequency and response effort as factors in reinforcement by timeout from avoidance.

Authors:  K Courtney; M Perone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Escape from an effortful situation.

Authors:  L K Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey when response effort is varied.

Authors:  E R Adair; B A Wright
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1976-02
View more
  15 in total

1.  Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: does unit price help?

Authors:  Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  What 50 years of research tell us about pausing under ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Henry D Schlinger; Adam Derenne; Alan Baron
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2008

3.  Effects of differing response-force requirements on food-maintained responding in C57Bl/6J mice.

Authors:  Troy J Zarcone; Rong Chen; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort.

Authors:  P C Friman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

5.  Effects of differing response-force requirements on food-maintained responding in CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Troy J Zarcone; Rong Chen; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Thirty Points About Motivation From Skinner's Book Verbal Behavior.

Authors:  Mark L Sundberg
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2013

7.  The isolation of motivational, motoric, and schedule effects on operant performance: a modeling approach.

Authors:  Ryan J Brackney; Timothy H C Cheung; Janet L Neisewander; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Optimal response vigor and choice under non-stationary outcome values.

Authors:  Amir Dezfouli; Bernard W Balleine; Richard Nock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

9.  Contingency Enhances Sensitivity to Loss in a Gambling Task with Diminishing Returns.

Authors:  Jonathan R Miller; Iser G DeLeon; Lisa M Toole; Gregory A Lieving; Melissa J Allman
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2016-02-24

10.  Escalation of food-maintained responding and sensitivity to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in mice.

Authors:  James E Goeders; Kevin S Murnane; Matthew L Banks; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.