Literature DB >> 3209958

A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

S R Hursh1, T G Raslear, D Shurtleff, R Bauman, L Simmons.   

Abstract

Laboratory studies of consumer demand theory require assumptions regarding the definition of price in the absence of a medium of exchange (money). In this study we test the proposition that the fundamental dimension of price is a cost-benefit ratio expressed as the effort expended per unit of food value consumed. Using rats as subjects, we tested the generality of this "unit price" concept by varying four dimensions of price: fixed-ratio schedule, number of food pellets per fixed-ratio completion, probability of reinforcement, and response lever weight or effort. Two levels of the last three factors were combined in a 2 x 2 x 2 design giving eight groups. Each group was studied under a series of six FR schedules. Using the nominal values of all factors to determine unit price, we found that grams of food consumed plotted as a function of unit price followed a single demand curve. Similarly, total work output (responses x effort) conformed to a single function when plotted in terms of unit price. These observations provided a template for interpreting the effects of biological factors, such as brain lesions or drugs, that might alter the cost-benefit ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3209958      PMCID: PMC1338908          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding.

Authors:  R E KEESEY; J W KLING
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Steady-state performance on fixed-, mixed-, and random-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Coping with rising food costs in a closed economy: feeding behavior and nocturnal hypothermia in pigeons.

Authors:  M E Rashotte; D Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat.

Authors:  G Collier; E Hirsch; P H Hamlin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972 Nov-Dec

8.  The post-reinforcement pause.

Authors:  M Felton; D O Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The economics of the law of effect.

Authors:  G H Collier; D F Johnson; W L Hill; L W Kaufman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  94 in total

1.  Behavioral economics and within-session changes in responding.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; S Swindell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Similar consumption and responding across single and multiple sources of drug.

Authors:  W K Bickel; G J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.

Authors:  J J Widholm; A Silberberg; S R Hursh; A A Imam; F R Warren-Boulton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis.

Authors:  R J DeGrandpre; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: does unit price help?

Authors:  Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Behavioral economic analysis of water intake in a laboratory rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Masumi Wakita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 2.163

9.  Does package size matter? A unit-price analysis of "demand" for food in baboons.

Authors:  R W Foltin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Demand curves for hypothetical cocaine in cocaine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Natalie R Bruner; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.