Literature DB >> 8551194

Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers.

S R Hursh1, G Winger.   

Abstract

The concepts of behavioral economics have proven to be useful for understanding the environmental control of overall levels of responding for a variety of commodities, including reinforcement by drug self-administration. These general concepts have implications for the assessment of abuse liability and drug abuse intervention and the formulation of public policy on drug abuse. An essential requirement is the ability to compare the demand for different drugs directly in order to assess relative abuse liability, and to compare demand for the same drug under different environmental and biological interventions to assess their ability to reduce demand. Until now, such comparisons were hampered by the confounding effect of varying drug doses and potencies that prevent quantitative comparisons of demand elasticity--sensitivity of consumption and responding to the constraint of price (effort). In this paper we describe a procedure to normalize demand-curve analysis that permits dose- and potency-independent comparisons of demand across drugs. The procedure is shown to be effective for comparing drug demand within and across the drug classes. The technique permits a quantitative ordering of demand that is consistent with the peak levels of responding maintained by the drugs. The same technique is generalized for the comparison of other types of reinforcers under different biological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8551194      PMCID: PMC1350144          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking.

Authors:  W K Bickel; R J DeGrandpre; J R Hughes; S T Higgins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food.

Authors:  S R Hursh; T G Raslear; D Shurtleff; R Bauman; L Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Behavioral economics of drug self-administration: an introduction.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  A quantitative assessment of phencyclidine dependence produced by oral self-administration in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  M E Carroll
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Modifying drug-reinforced behavior by altering the economic conditions of the drug and a nondrug reinforcer.

Authors:  M E Carroll; G G Carmona; S A May
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An economic analysis of "demand" for food in baboons.

Authors:  R W Foltin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Behavioral economics: a novel experimental approach to the study of drug dependence.

Authors:  W K Bickel; R J DeGrandpre; S T Higgins
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Opioid thermal antinociception in rhesus monkeys: receptor mechanisms and temperature dependency.

Authors:  E A Walker; E R Butelman; B R DeCosta; J H Woods
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  89 in total

1.  Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.

Authors:  J A Nevin; S Holland; A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of experimental Unemployment, Employment and Punishment analogs on opioid seeking and consumption in heroin-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Mark K Greenwald
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Relation between choice of ethanol concentration and response rates under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: studies with rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Thomas H Gomez; Richard A Meisch
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Comparing demand functions when different price manipulations are used: does unit price help?

Authors:  Catherine E Sumpter; William Temple; T Mary Foster
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Behavior analysis and farm animal welfare.

Authors:  T M Foster; W Temple; A Poling
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

6.  Effects of economy type and nicotine on the essential value of food in rats.

Authors:  Rachel N Cassidy; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Labor supply and consumption of food in a closed economy under a range of fixed- and random-ratio schedules: tests of unit price.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Jamie M Dake; Ellie C Mauel; Ryan R Rowe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Consumer brand choice: individual and group analyses of demand elasticity.

Authors:  Jorge M Oliveira-Castro; Gordon R Foxall; Teresa C Schrezenmaier
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Demand curves for hypothetical cocaine in cocaine-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Natalie R Bruner; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.